Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Where's the problem/question?
Answer:
990 cm3
Step-by-step explanation:
lengh x width/ breadth x height
9x10x11 =
990cm3
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
<h2>3500</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the ratio of the profit, cost of materials and labour in the production of
an article to be 5:7:13 respectively, total ratio = 5+7+13 = 25
If the cost of labour is x, the cost of material will be 840+x (since the cost of materials is Le 840 more than that of labour) .
Let the total cost of producing the article be y.
Cost of labour = 13/25 * y = x
Cost of labour = 13y/25 = x.................... 1
Cost of material = 7/25*y = 840+x
Cost of material = 7y/25 = 840+x ..................... 2
From 1, 13y = 25x
x = 13y/25 ................... 3
Substituting equation 3 into 2:
7y/25 = 840+x
7y/25 = 840+13y/25
collect the like terms:
7y/25 - 13y/25 = 840
-6y/25 = 840
-6y = 25*840
y = 25*840/6
y = 3,500
<em>Hence the total cost of producing the article is 3500</em>
Answer:
210
Step-by-step explanation: