1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
3 years ago
15

Assume, for Canada, that the domestic price of wheat without international trade is lower than the world price of wheat. This su

ggests that, in the production of wheat, a.Canada has a comparative advantage over other countries and Canada will export wheat. b.Canada has a comparative advantage over other countries and Canada will import wheat. c.other countries have a comparative advantage over Canada and Canada will import wheat. d.other countries have a comparative advantage over Canada and Canada will export wheat.
Business
1 answer:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a.Canada has a comparative advantage over other countries and Canada will export wheat.

Explanation:

In the case when the domestic price is less than the world price of wheat so it is shown that there is the comparative advantage over the other countries due to this the canada would export the wheat. Also the demand is less or the supply of the wheat is higher. So ultimately it decrease the opportunity cost of generating the wheat

Therefore the above represent the answer

You might be interested in
It is now 10 years after you have graduated. You are advising a large company regarding its compensation and tax planning for it
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Answer is explained below.

Explanation:

(a)

For the employer to be indifferent the FV of the salary should be equal to the PV of deferred compensation

after three years

The net salary cost to the company = Salary * (1- tax rate)

Tax benefit on Salary at current tax rate 35%  

Net cost to company for $ 1 Salary

Salary $1.00  

Less: Tax benefit  35% $0.35

Net salary cost to Company $0.65

Tax benefit on Deferred compensation after 3 years 31%  

The deferred compensation should be an amount whose PV at rate of return of 6.50% should be $ 0.65

so that the employer remains indifferent between salary and deferred compensation.

Hence, we will calculate the future value of the after tax salary cost to company for $ 1 salary paid.

After tax cost to the Company $0.65  

FV = PV * (1+r) ^ n

where, PV is the present value of the after tax salary cost

r = rate of return( which is 6.50% as stated in the problem)

n = period (which is 3 years as stated in the problem)

= 0.65 * (1+.065) ^ 3

=0.65 * (1.065) ^ 3

= 0.65 * 1.21

= $ 0.79

The value derived above is the after tax cost of deferred compensation to the Company.We will calculate the

gross deferred tax cost to the company after considering the tax rate after 3 years

After tax value of deferred compensation $0.79  

Tax rate for the company (after 3 years) 31%

Deferred tax compensation (After tax value/(1 - tax rate)) $1.14

The company would be offering $ 1.14 as deferred compensation after 3 years for every $ 1 of salary it offers

at the present and would be indifferent between the two offers.

(b)

The company would be offering $ 1.14 as deferred compensation after 3 years for every $ 1 of salary it offers

at the present.

The net deferred compensation receivable by the employees after deducting tax at the rates applicable after

3 years would be as under

Deferred tax compensation offerred by the Company $1.14  

Tax rate after 3 years for employees 40%

Net deferred compensation receivable by the employees $0.68

The employees would prefer salary in the current year if the future value of the salary after 3 years is not

less than deferred compensation they will receive after three years

Net deferred compensation receivable by the employees        0.68    

The employee would agree to salary in the current at lower amounts if the future value after 3 years is

not less than $ 0.68

Hence, to calculate the minimum acceptable salary, we would calculate the present value if the

future value after 3 years at rate of return of 6.50% is $ 0.68

Calculation of the PV if the future value is $ 0.68

PV = FV/(1+r) ^ n

= 0.68/(1+0.065) ^ 3

= 0.68/1.21

= $ 0.56

The value derived above is the after tax value of salary to the employee.We will calculate the

gross salary receivable by the employee after considering the tax rate after 3 years

After tax value $0.56  

Tax rate on salary for current year for employees 35%

Gross salary(After tax salary/(1-tax rate)) $0.86

Hence, the employee would be ready to take a salary cut of $ 0.14 per $ 1 of salary

The pay cut which would agreeable to the employee would be 14% of their current salary

(c.)

PV of deferred compensation should be $ 0.65 for the employee to be indifferent

FV = PV * (1+r) ^ n

= $ 0.65 * (1+.065) ^ 3

= $ 0.65 * (1.065) ^ 3

= $ 0.65 * 1.21

= $ 0.79

The value derived above is the after tax value of salary to the employee.We will calculate the

gross salary receivable by the employee after considering the tax rate for the current year

After tax value of deferred compensation $0.79  

Tax rate for current year for the employees 40%

Deferred tax compensation(After tax salary/(1-tax rate)) $1.32

8 0
3 years ago
Discovered
vesna_86 [32]
Um I think it’s number 4.
7 0
3 years ago
Adina deposits $1,000 in the bank. The bank can then use her savings to make _____ to/for _____.
Allisa [31]
<span>Adina deposits $1,000 in the bank. The bank can then use her savings to make loans to/for investors. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the one reason we study ethics is to see whether the moral beliefs we already hold are consistent and philosophically j
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

The statement is: True.

Explanation:

Ethics is the field of philosophy that studies human behavior, what is right and what is wrong, the good and bad, the moral, well being, virtue, happiness, and duty and how they affect the day by day activities of individuals according to the society they live in.

One of the reasons to study ethics is to verify if the beliefs we already hold can be justified.

4 0
3 years ago
An environmentally, friendly 2,800 square-foot green home (99% air tight) cost about 8% more to construct than a same-sized conv
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

2121.566 will be saved

Explanation:

Extra cost=8%

Saving per year=15%

Extra Cost of home=250000*0.08=$20000

Let the energy saving required per year to justify the home=x

Extra cost paid = P.v of energy saving

20000=x*Annuity factor(10%@30 years)

20000=x*9.427

X=2121.566

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the executive branch interact with the other two branches?<br>​
    10·1 answer
  • A country with a relatively low level of real GDP per person is considering adopting two policies to promote economic growth.The
    8·1 answer
  • HELP ME !! 10 points
    11·1 answer
  • On a bowed production possibilities frontier, as you move down along the curve more of one good must be given up to receive one
    11·1 answer
  • Max is designing a symbol for Clean Glow, a company that produces cleaning supplies. Once it is completed, the symbol will be le
    9·1 answer
  • Cullumber Corporation purchased trading investment bonds for $55,000 at par. At December 31, Cullumber received annual interest
    9·1 answer
  • President Bigego is running for re-election against Senator Pander. Bigego proclaims that more people are working now than when
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.<br> Workers like authoritarian leaders best.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    12·2 answers
  • Who here needs a friend?
    6·2 answers
  • Instructions: Questions 1-4 use the financial model on tab Q1-4 in the Exam Workbook. Complete the model by filling in the blank
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!