Answer:
I think the answer is 1,032 pounds
Step-by-step explanation:
You would have to multiply the dimensions of the table first:
8*3*1=24.
Then you would multiply that by 43.
24*43=1,032.
I THINK this is the answer.
Answer:
they usually cost nothing if you go through your bank
The answer choice which describes the function is; Choice B; neither symmetry about the y-axis nor has order 2 rotational symmetry about the origin.
<h3>What is rotational symmetry?</h3>
Rotational symmetry, otherwise termed radial symmetry, is the characteristic of a shape when it looks the same after some rotation by a partial turn. On this note, since the function represents a quartic graph, it follows that the function has neither symmetry about the y-axis nor has order 2 rotational symmetry about the origin.
Therefore, the function f(x) = −4x⁴ + 3x³ − 2x² − x + 5 is neither symmetry about the y-axis nor has order 2 rotational symmetry about the origin.
Read more on rotational symmetry;
brainly.com/question/15178808
#SPJ1
Answer:
Th computed value of the test statistic is 3.597
Step-by-step explanation:
The null and the alternative hypothesis is as follows:
Null Hypothesis:
the population correlation coefficient is equal to zero
the population correlation coefficient is not equal to zero
The test statistics for Pearson correlation coefficient is thus computed as :
where;
r = correlation coefficient = 0.60
n = sample size = 25
So;
t = 3.597
Comparing to a critical value of t (23 degrees of freedom two-tailed value) = 2.069
Decision Rule:
Since computed value of t is greater than the critical value of t; We reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.
Conclusion:
We conclude that the population correlation coefficient significantly differs from 0 at 5% (0.05) level of significance.
