Answer:
a. the programs were being taken to the Supreme Court
Explanation:
Roosevelt overcame criticisms and fierce opposition to earn a second term by a landslide. His New Deal was working, and the economy showed strong signs of recovery. The attacks against him called him a communist.
However, by the time his second term started, many of the policies and legislation enacted to create the New Deal were being evaluated in the Supreme Court, and some had been overturned.
Roosevelt fought to put into place a second part of the New Deal, this time more focused on the legal guarantees for the policies he had created.
Yes, I do agree with the delegates rule of secrecy. Delegates handled many classified cases that could harm the country if they were exposed. In the debates, multiple important topics were discussed. These topics were not exposed to the general public yet, so they could’ve been at risk to being shown to countries like Great Britain.
Answer:
Catholics
Explanation:
The religious group that did not expand their membership by great numbers during the Second Great Awakening was Catholics. The Second Great Awakening in the United States started in 1790 and ended in 1840
Answer:
Yep, they had laws.
Explanation:
They created a legal system so that there wouldn't be any chaos. They were created back at 2100 to 2050 BCE.
for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.
Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.
Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.
Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.
