1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
6

Johnson Electronics is considering extending trade credit to some customers previously considered poor risks. Sales would increa

se by $230,000 if credit is extended to these new customers. Of the new accounts receivable generated, 5 percent will prove to be uncollectible. Additional collection costs will be 2 percent of sales, and production and selling costs will be 71 percent of sales. The firm is in the 20 percent tax bracket.
a. Compute the incremental income after taxes.

b. What will Johnson’s incremental return on sales be if these new credit customers are accepted? (Input your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.)

c. If the accounts receivable turnover ratio is 3 to 1, and no other asset buildup is needed to serve the new customers, what will Johnson’s incremental return on new average investment be? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Input your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.)
Business
1 answer:
torisob [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a) $       40,480  

b) 17.60%  

Explanation:

Working:  

 

a. Increase in sales a 2,30,000  

Less:    

  • Bad debts expenses

b=a*5% 11,500  

  • Collection costs

c=a*2% 4,600  

  • Production ans selling costs

d=a*71% 1,63,300  

  • Earning before tax

e=a-b-c-d 50,600  

  • Less: Tax @ 20%

f=e*20%

10,120  

Net Income 40,480  

b)Return on sales  

Net Income/Sales  

40480/230000  

17.60%

You might be interested in
Claire is the head of product design for her company. She has to create the layout for the next generation of smartphones. She h
Mars2501 [29]
I Think The answer is c I hope it helps Trying To help others
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When megan purchased several bottles of pepsi beverages and snacks to bring to her family's holiday celebration, it represented
den301095 [7]
When Megan purchased the Pepsi beverages and snacks to bring to her family's holiday celebration this represented the purchase of consumer goods. Consumer goods are anything from Pepsi products, to automobiles and refrigerators.
4 0
3 years ago
Perdue Company purchased equipment on April 1, 2014, for $270,000. The equipment was expected to have a useful life of three yea
otez555 [7]

Answer:

<u>Straight line:</u>

2014 $ 65,250  

2015 $  87,000  

2016 $  87,000  

2017 $   21,750

<u>units-of-output method:</u>

2014 $ 108,750

2015 $   79,750

2016 $  58,000

2017  $   14,500

<u>dobule declining method</u>

2014  135,000  

2015  45,000  

2016  15,000  

2017  9,000  

Explanation:

<u>Straight line:</u>

(cost - salvage value) / useful life

(270,000 - 9,000)/3 = 87,000 per complete year

First year: from April 1st to December 31th

87,000 x 9/12 = 65,250

Second and third year are complete year thus, 87,000

fourth year: from Jan 1st to March 31th:

87,000 x 3/12 = 21,750

<u>units-of-output method:</u>

(cost - salvage value) / unit of output

261,000 / 18,000 = 14.5 per hour

We multiply each year hours by this rate

7,500 x 14.5 = 108,750

5,500x 14.5 =   79,750

4,000x 14.5 =   58,000

1,000 x 14.5 =   14,500

<em><u>double declining </u></em>

we multiply by twice the rate of of straight line:

1/3 x 2 = 2/3 we depreciate this amount of the carrying vbalue per year

Last year we adjust to obtain the residual value

Year   Beginning   Rate   Dep expense   Carrying value

2014     270,000     0.50     135,000     135,000  

2015     135,000     0.67     90,000     45,000  

2016     45,000     0.67     30,000     15,000  

2017     15,000                6,000      9,000  

5 0
3 years ago
Read and compare the following two scenarios. Explain why the court should or should not pierce the corporate veil in each scena
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

Piercing the Corporate Veil:

1. Smith Services, Inc. and Laker Express:  With the given facts, Smith Services is still in operation by the alter ego, since Smith - the sole owner, has continued to provide trucking services.  Smith should be able to pay for the debts it owed Laker Express.  The question is: why was Smith Services, Inc. dissolved in the first place when the sole owner could continue privately to do the same business?  Is there element of fraud involved, or was it trying to avoid its obligations?  It seems that the dissolution was an effort to avoid liabilities and not because of impaired ability to operate the business because its own debtors did not pay for services on several contracts.  Another question is: during the dissolution or liquidation of Smith Services, Inc. were other creditors not settled and where was Laker Express then?

However, it appears that the dissolution was just to avoid liability, especially the $35,000 debt owed to Laker Express for fuel purchases.

Therefore, in this situation where it seems that the corporate form is ignored, commingling of assets exists, and that Smith Services, Inc. is an instrumentality for Tony Smith, I will advise that the corporate veil be lifted.  Tony Smith should be held liable for the business debts of Smith Services, Inc. because he has continued to use the assets of Smith Services, Inc. to run a sole proprietorship in the same line of business.  However, recourse must be had to the State laws on piercing the corporate veil.

2. Country Contractors, Inc. & Westside Storage of Indianapolis:

Since Country Contractors, Inc and the Westside Storage are based in Indiana, the decision to pierce the corporate veil should be based on the eight factors that are applicable for piercing the veil:  They include: undercapitalization;  absence of corporate records;  fraudulent representation by corporation shareholders or directors;  use of the corporation to promote fraud, injustice or illegal activities;  payment by the corporation of individual obligations;  commingling of assets and affairs;  failure to observe required corporate formalities; or  other shareholder acts or conduct ignoring, controlling, or manipulating the corporate form.

But, the facts in this case do not support that any of the factors had been breached.

So, I do not support that Songers are personally liable for Country's failure to complete its contract.

Explanation:

The corporate veil is an important instrument for protecting shareholders of corporations from being held liable for the liabilities of the corporation in their individual and personal capacities.  Corporate veil ensures that the entity is treated as a separate entity from its shareholders.  It is a protection offered by law to encourage private enterprise and ensure that the debts of corporate bodies are not tagged to the individual shareholders.  It is this veil that ensures the limited liability concept, whereby, the shareholders could only lose their capital contributions in case of business failure or dissolution.

Piercing the corporate veil is a court decision to lift the veil that separates the shareholders of corporation from their shareholders.  There are special factors that must be met for courts to pierce the corporate veil and they do it reluctantly.

5 0
3 years ago
Blumen Textiles Corporation began April with a budget for 22,000 hours of production in the Weaving Department. The department h
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

A. 1300 Favorable

B. $7,200 UnFavorable

Explanation:

A. Calculation to determine the variable factory overhead controllable variance

First step is to calculate the Budgeted rate of variable overhead

Budgeted rate of variable overhead = $50,600/22,000

Budgeted rate of variable overhead= $2.3per hour

Second step is to calculate the Standard variable overhead for actual production

Standard variable overhead for actual production = 23,000 x $2.3

Standard variable overhead for actual production = $52,900

Now let calculate the Variable factory overhead controllable variance using this formula

Variable factory overhead controllable variance = Standard variable overhead - Actual variable overhead

Let plug in the formula

Variable factory overhead controllable variance= $52,900 - ($86,400 - 34,800)

Variable factory overhead controllable variance= 1300 Favorable

Therefore Variable factory overhead controllable variance is 1300 Favorable

B. Calculation to determine the fixed factory overhead volume variance.

First step is to calculate the Predetermined fixed overhead rate using this formula

Predetermined fixed overhead rate = 34,800/29,000

Predetermined fixed overhead rate = $1.20 per hour

Second step is to calculate the Fixed overhead applied

Using this formula

Fixed overhead applied = Standard hours x Standard rate

Let plug in the formula

Fixed overhead applied= 23,000 x $1.20

Fixed overhead applied= $27,600

Now let calculate the Fixed overhead volume variance using this formula

Fixed overhead volume variance = Fixed overhead applied - Budgeted fixed overhead

Let plug in the formula

Fixed overhead volume variance= $27,600 - 34,800

Fixed overhead volume variance= $7,200 UnFavorable

Therefore The Fixed overhead volume variance is $7,200 UnFavorable

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Petrus Framing's cost formula for its supplies cost is $1,920 per month plus $11 per frame. For the month of March, the company
    11·1 answer
  • Prepare adjusting entries for the following transactions. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when the amount is e
    13·1 answer
  • Identify how to calculate nominal interest rates and real interest rates. Assume that you put $100 in the bank. Use numeric exam
    8·1 answer
  • A country has national saving of $50 billion, government expenditures of $20 billion, domestic investment of $10 billion, and ne
    15·1 answer
  • In 2018, internal auditors discovered that Fay, Inc., had debited an expense account for the $700,000 cost of a machine purchase
    7·1 answer
  • The United States ran large trade deficits during the 1980s and 1990s. How would you determine whether these trade deficits led
    8·1 answer
  • You are considering a job that offers a pension of 80% of your highest yearly salary prior to retirement. You expect your highes
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Elmofud, Inc. is considering splitting its stock. The stock is currently priced at $90 per share. You own 100 shares of the s
    7·1 answer
  • You are considering to buy a $250,000 property with a 80% LTV ratio and have two mortgage choices: a FRM or a FRM with an IO per
    5·1 answer
  • Identify the trade-restraining practice that this example demonstrates. Two retailers decide that they will both sell no more th
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!