MASS: because it is the measure of the amount of matter in an object
Studying animals in the wild is considered somewhat experimentally out of control because of several reasons.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Study of wild animals can be done using several methods but none will be as effective as studying captivated animals. Using stationary cameras is a method to observe animals in the wild. The stationary nature of the camera makes it necessary for the animals to appear within the field of the camera.
This is difficult in places of low animal density. In addition to that placing camera at a longer distance to watch a larger area decreases the resolution of the images. When it comes to shallow water systems, the field imagery used to track the aquatic species frequently gets affected by issues like sun flicker.
Unmanned aerial vehicles can also be used to track and study animals in the wild. This is good alternative but filming through dense canopies or turbid water is a limitation. Bio loggers can also be used for animal tracking but it is limited by weight since it has to be carried by animals.
The animals would lose their homes and might die because they have no shelter. The plants that are in the exact spot where the house is going to be will die. Overall I think the animal species that lives there would decrease rapidly, which would reduce the biodiversity in the area.
As humans we can do whatever to gentically modify trees, but trees take over 100 years to grow back, to fix this, we could prevent unessecary tree cutting and plant new trees for the next generations , they're renewable because they can be replenished over a course of time
