The statement true regarding the gay rights of the LGBTQ Americans is that states legally must recognize the stated gender of transgender Americans.
<h3>What are gay rights?</h3>
The rights, which are granted to people who do not have sexual orientation only towards the opposite gender, and that such rights protect them from discrimination in the society are known as the gay rights.
The gay rights are generally in the hands of the people belonging to the LGBTQ community. American states have legally recognized transgender as an American gender.
Hence, option C holds true regarding the gay rights.
Learn more about gay rights here:
brainly.com/question/14655753
#SPJ1
I hope this helps! If it doesnt then just look it up on google i guess lol
Answer:
C.Population
Explanation:
The house of rep is based on the pop. in each state
According to the google box thing, “Generally, to be legally valid, most contracts must contain two elements: All parties must agree about an offer made by one party and accepted by the other. Something of value must be exchanged for something else of value. This can include goods, cash, services, or a pledge to exchange these items.” dont know if that answers your questions or not but....yeah
Answer: Article VI; Article III Section 2.
Explanation: In Article III Section 2 the Constitution says "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority (...)" we see the power of the judges to all cases under the Constitution.
But, in Article VI, it says: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding", thats the expression of the Supremacy of the Constitution over another rules and the judge's decisions. We can appreciate here the division of powers. In conclution, the propose of constitutional amendments overrule judicial decisions.