The principle of stare decisis, which involves precedent, obliges other courts to apply the law consistently in the same circumstances.
When a case involves the same or similar facts or the same legal issues, a judicial decision known as a precedent is used as a guide. At common law, courts must follow the precedents of other courts. Courts must follow certain precedents but not others.
Determining which decisions apply to a particular court can be difficult due to the complexity of the federal structure. Priority is usually based on several decisions. Sometimes a single decision can set a precedent. For example, a state supreme court's interpretation of an individual statute is usually considered part of the law at the outset.
Learn about precedents:
brainly.com/question/6196271
#SPJ4
Answer:
Jun 2, 2019 — The 19th Amendment would give black women the same rights granted to black men after the Civil War with the 15th Amendment, which South Carolina ...
Inductive arguments aim to show not that the conclusion must be true but rather that it is likely true. ... No inductive argument aims to prove its conclusion with certainty. Mathematical arguments are a type of deductive argument. Cause-and-effect reasoning is a type of deductive argument. So false
Answer: National House of Senatorial Privilege, Office of Policy Development,
