Effects that are dependent on the size of the population and regulate the growth of populations are called density-dependent effects.
It revolves around <span>challenge an orthodox position concerning historical explanation. Historical explanations often designed in such a way that always favor the one who live to tell the tell. E.h carr's on the other hand pointed out that the version given by so called 'winenrs' in the history often does not reflect the truth.
</span>
<span>congress enacted the war powers resolution in 1973 </span>To limit the president's authority to introduce American troops into hostile foreign lands without congressional approval. To restore role of congress in war.
hope this helps
Answer:
Implicit prejudice; explicit prejudice.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, both of this cases of prejudice involves negative attitudes against a certain individual, person, group, etc. In the first case, the implicit, the attitude is not openly talked, verbalized; it's unspoken. But, in the second case, the explicit prejudice involves the awareness of hatred or negative attitude of the individual. So, overall, in the first case the person is not completely aware of the thoughts, attitude or feelings, but on the second case it is completely.
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
