Answer:
The correct answer is:
Post hoc fallacy.
Explanation:
The post hoc fallacy is an argument based in the fact that an event happens just after the other, in this case it does not mean that just because the historian predicted the fact the result is a consequence of what he said, or that what he said was true. In this order, the fallacy uses the temporal consequence as an argument. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that temporal sequence is naturally part of the causality process.
Answer:
<h3>Jack would most likely agree to what his professor asked him to do.</h3>
Explanation:
- Jack would most likely agree to what his professor asked him to do because the professor has indicated him to do so. As we know professors are the governing figures inside the classroom, students think that they must obey them.
- Here, Jack would likely pinch Jill to wake her up as requested by the professor because Jack knows that pinching her does not necessarily mean embarrassing Jill or inflicting her great harm.
Answer:
medical history of individuals
The Treaty organized by the victorious Allied Powers after the First World War, placing harsh sanctions on Germany and its Allies. - The German, Russian and Habsburg Empires had disappeared. - The Communist Revolution had taken place, striking fear all across Europe.
Spain and France where the ones who battled for control of Latin America
