1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
3 years ago
5

Your pharmaceutical firm is seeking to open up new international markets by partnering with various local distributors. The diff

erent distributors within a country are stronger with different market segments (hospitals, retail pharmacies, etc.) but also have substantial overlap. In Egypt, you calculate that the annual value created by one distributor is $420 million per year, but would be $560 million if two distributors carried your product line. Assuming a nonstrategic view of bargaining, you would expect to capture $ million of this deal. (Hint: The two distributors are independent of each other; therefore, you conduct separate negotiations with each.) Argentina also has two distributors that add value equivalent to the value added by the two distributors in Egypt, but both are run by the government. Assuming a nonstrategic view of bargaining, you would expect to capture $ million of this deal. In Argentina, if you do not reach an agreement with the government distributors, you can set up a less efficient Internet-based distribution system that would generate $140 million in value to you. Assuming a nonstrategic view of bargaining, you would expect to capture $ million of this deal.
Business
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Case 1 = $420 million

Case 2 = $280 million

Case 3 = $350 million

Explanation:

As per the data given in the question,

Annual value by one distributor = $420 million per year

Annual value by two distributor = $560 million per year

Case 1)

The marginal value of first distributor is more than second  

So when negotiating the value, it is = $560 million - $420 million = $140 million

and this value would be distribute between both. so each will get = $140 million / 2 = $70 million

and you would expect to capture $420 million of this deal

Case 2)

As distributors are run by government, so negotiation will be done with both the distributor at same time and margin would be $560 million and you would be grabbed = $560 million ÷ 2 = $280 million

Case 3)

In this case marginal amount of contact = $560 million - $140 million = $420 million

and half of it = $420 million ÷ 2 = $ 210 million, which is the amount to be offered  

and you would expect to grab the remaining amount = $560 million - $210 million  

= $350 million

You might be interested in
Suppose that real domestic output in an economy is 20 units, the quantity of inputs is 10, and the price of each input is $4. An
Arisa [49]

Answer:

$2 per-unit cost of production

Explanation:

since 20 units are produced and 10 units of input are used so,

divide 20/ 10 to get per unit cost of production.

        20/10 = $2

6 0
3 years ago
Which assertion relates to the following statement? "Assets, liabilities, and equity interests are included in the financial sta
KengaRu [80]

Answer: Valuation

Explanation:

The assertion that assertion relates to the statement that Assets, liabilities, and equity interests are included in the financial statements at appropriate amounts is the valuation assertion.

According to the assertion of accuracy and valuation, it simply means that all the figures that are presented in a financial statement are known to be accurate and are based on proper valuation of the assets, the liabilities and the equity balances

3 0
2 years ago
Why would businesses supply more product at higher prices?
kykrilka [37]
I would think C. because A. would be cheaper prices, and B. is false, D. just does not sound right.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two tasks does an industry safety and health engineer perform?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

They both care for the well-being of people and they also keep people safe.

I'm assuming

8 0
2 years ago
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING WILL CAUSE NO CHANGE IN PRODUCER SURPLUS? A) IMPOSITION OF A NON BINDING PRICE CEILING IN THE MARKET. B)
Svetllana [295]
The answer is A. Imposition of a non binding price ceiling in the market

Price Ceiling is  when a government impose a price limit over a specific product

Non-Binding Price ceiling is if that price limit that imposed to the product is still <em><u>higher than market equilibrium ,</u></em> which won't do anything to producer's surplus
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Nathan has been unable to trust banks since the failure of his savings and loan bank. He claims that storing his hard-earned mon
    9·1 answer
  • After a tax is imposed on the buyers of bottled water, the price buyers pay is $2.50 per bottle and the price sellers receive is
    10·1 answer
  • Inventory records for Dunbar Incorporated revealed the following:Date Transaction Number of units Unit CostApr. 1 Beginning inve
    12·1 answer
  • Wyatt Co. has a probable loss that can only be reasonably estimated within a range of outcomes. No single amount within the rang
    10·1 answer
  • Yvette is preparing a direct claim message. Her bank account has been incorrectly debited a duplicate charge of $132.45 for a pa
    9·2 answers
  • Kenneth is the CEO of a successful carpet company. His factories consume a lot of water and energy, as well as pollute the air a
    11·1 answer
  • The presence of​ ________ in financial markets leads to adverse selection and moral hazard problems that interfere with the effi
    12·1 answer
  • According to coase's theory of the firm, why do firms exist? how do firms contribute to the efficiency of the market economy in
    10·1 answer
  • You start a new business selling a product thats the best of its kind on the market. In addition to this product, what must you
    9·1 answer
  • Emma worked the following schedule:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!