1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
3 years ago
5

Your pharmaceutical firm is seeking to open up new international markets by partnering with various local distributors. The diff

erent distributors within a country are stronger with different market segments (hospitals, retail pharmacies, etc.) but also have substantial overlap. In Egypt, you calculate that the annual value created by one distributor is $420 million per year, but would be $560 million if two distributors carried your product line. Assuming a nonstrategic view of bargaining, you would expect to capture $ million of this deal. (Hint: The two distributors are independent of each other; therefore, you conduct separate negotiations with each.) Argentina also has two distributors that add value equivalent to the value added by the two distributors in Egypt, but both are run by the government. Assuming a nonstrategic view of bargaining, you would expect to capture $ million of this deal. In Argentina, if you do not reach an agreement with the government distributors, you can set up a less efficient Internet-based distribution system that would generate $140 million in value to you. Assuming a nonstrategic view of bargaining, you would expect to capture $ million of this deal.
Business
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Case 1 = $420 million

Case 2 = $280 million

Case 3 = $350 million

Explanation:

As per the data given in the question,

Annual value by one distributor = $420 million per year

Annual value by two distributor = $560 million per year

Case 1)

The marginal value of first distributor is more than second  

So when negotiating the value, it is = $560 million - $420 million = $140 million

and this value would be distribute between both. so each will get = $140 million / 2 = $70 million

and you would expect to capture $420 million of this deal

Case 2)

As distributors are run by government, so negotiation will be done with both the distributor at same time and margin would be $560 million and you would be grabbed = $560 million ÷ 2 = $280 million

Case 3)

In this case marginal amount of contact = $560 million - $140 million = $420 million

and half of it = $420 million ÷ 2 = $ 210 million, which is the amount to be offered  

and you would expect to grab the remaining amount = $560 million - $210 million  

= $350 million

You might be interested in
Sophia could not afford expensive furnishings, but wanted a stylish home. after researching many options, she went to a local ta
maksim [4K]
I think Sophia is responding to Brand Image Consistency.

This retailing challenge must meet Sophia's expectation on what she saw on its website and ads to what she will actually see in person. The image of the brand must be consistent from its advertisement to its actual product. 


6 0
3 years ago
Is the following example a social group or a task group?
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

social

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Pierre was served with a summons indicating that he had thirty days to respond
irinina [24]

Answer: Answer

Explanation: just took quiz quiz on edge

8 0
3 years ago
Jordan is a sales officer who has been underperforming over the last three months. At the last monthly operations cycle meeting,
Rashid [163]

Answer:

D. Filtering.

Explanation:

Business content filtering has two objectives – to prevent network users visiting unsafe websites and to enforce Internet user policies. The first objective is achieved by each request to visit a website being checked against blacklists of known unsafe websites

6 0
3 years ago
In the AD partnership, Allen's capital is $140,000 and Daniel's is $40,000 and they share income in a 3:1 ratio, respectively. T
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

D) 137000 39000

Explanation:

Allen  140,000

Daniel 40,000

Capital before admission 180,000

share ratio 3:1

Capital after admission:

180,000 + 40,000 = 220,000

David participation: 20%

220,000 x 20% = 44,000

David investment  40,000

goodwill: 4,000

There is a difference in goodwill which will be supported for the old partner as their current share ratio

Allen 4,000 x 3/4 = 3,000

Daniel 4,000 x 1/4 = 1,000

Capital after David admission:

140,000 - 3,000 = 137,000

40,000 - 1,000 = 39,000

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Tony charges $5 to park a car in his parking lot. He pays $40 per day to rent the lot. If 50 cars park in his lot during the day
    6·1 answer
  • The manufacturing overhead budget at Pendley Corporation is based on budgeted direct labor-hours. The direct labor budget indica
    8·1 answer
  • A consumer has decided to buy a new automobile. before investing money in that purchase, the consumer should invest time in ____
    15·1 answer
  • An engineer invests $5,000 at the end of every year for a 40-year career. If the engineer wants $1 million in savings at retirem
    9·1 answer
  • Gaston Bank had interest revenues of $70 million last year and $30 million in interest expenses. About $300 million of Gaston's
    6·1 answer
  • A college graduate who is searching for his first job illustrates the concept of cyclical unemployment. frictional unemployment.
    15·1 answer
  • Generally, State A may exercise "long arm" jurisdiction over a defendant located in State B if the defendant:________. a. once r
    8·1 answer
  • Credit reports are viewed by?
    11·1 answer
  • Cedric Company recently traded in an older model computer for a new model. The old model's book value was $140,000 (original cos
    11·1 answer
  • Inez is compensated based on a plan that pays a base salary, with commission in addition. Inez receives $40,000/year salary (and
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!