Help meeeeeeeeeee please
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
In First method : counting up, counting back on a number line,
If we want the quotient after dividing the number by 5 then we count how many 5 we get from 0 to the dividend.
For example :
Since, from 0 to 30 there are six 5's obtained. ( because 5 × 6 = 30 )
Thus,
In Second Method : dividing by 10, and then doubling the quotient.
First we divide the number by 10 then multiply the quotient by 2.
For Example:
Since,
Thus,
Now, when we compare the above methods then we conclude that for the smaller numbers first method is appropriate because for small numbers we can easily count total 5's from 0. While for large numbers Second method is appropriate because it is hard to count the total 5's for the large number.
Answer:
If you have a general point (x, y), and you reflect it across the x-axis, the coordinates of the new point will be:
(x,-y)
So we only change the sign of the y-component.
Now, if we do a reflection across the x-axis of a whole figure, then we apply the reflection to all the points that make the figure.
Then, we could just apply the reflection to the vertices of the square, then graph the new vertices, and then connect them, that is equivalent to graph the image of the square after the reflection.
The original vertices are:
C = (-3, 7)
D = (0, 7)
E = (0, 10)
F = (-3, 10)
Now we apply the reflection, remember that this only changes the sign of the y-component, then the new vertices are:
C' = (-3, -7)
D' = (0, -7)
E' = (0, - 10)
F' = (0, - 10)
Now we need to graph these points and connect them to get the reflected figure, the image can be seen below.
