The professor's suggestion belongs to the field of <u>"evolutionary psychology".</u>
Evolutionary psychology is a hypothetical way to deal with psychology that endeavors to clarify valuable mental and mental qualities, for example, memory, recognition, or dialect—as adjustments, i.e., as the practical results of regular determination.
The motivation behind this methodology is to bring the utilitarian state of mind about organic instruments, for example, the insusceptible framework into the field of brain research, and to approach mental components correspondingly.
Answer:
high degree of managerial mobility between companies
Explanation:
An individual is considered as the basic unit of a social organization. The concept of individualism finds expression in the high degree of the managerial mobility between the companies, which is not a desired thing.
Individualism is defined as the belief where the need of each person is more important than the need of whole people or society. The Western society is an example where we can see the concept of individualism. People in the Western society are more self centered and gives priority to oneself.
Scarcity is a basic economic problem which is faced by every society due to the fact that the wants if economic agents such as individuals, firms or the government is unlimited.
- Scarcity simply means when a particular thing is in short supply. Scarcity exists due to the fact that our wants are unlimited and there are limited resources to meet such wants.
- In the map above, it can be noted that only Japan has mineral resources while the other countries do not. Also, the scarcity that the United States faces are skilled labor and water.
In conclusion, if a country has some resources but they're not efficiently managed, it'll still bring about scarcity.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/4747543
The correct sentence of the four is this one:
<span>Neither the train nor the bus runs that late.
and in this sentence the verb agrees with the compound subject, in the rest it does not (but it would not be a big mistake if the verb was in plural form here- there are arguments for a plural form here too).</span>
