Answer:
Zola's gross income is worked out under community property state;
Explanation:
community property state
Dividends ($1200/2) $600
Interest on certificate of deposit ($900/2) $450
Salary ($80,000/2) $40,000
Gross income $41,050
Under community law system, all the property is deemed to be community property and is held jointly by the spouses unless the property is acquired before marriage or inheritance or gift.
For federal tax purposes, each spouse is taxed one and half of the property belonging to community. Therefore Zola is taxed 50% for the incomes of her spouse as well including the interest on certificate of deposit.
Answer:
Rs. 5993.75
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of laying the path is given below:
= {area of(pool +path)- area of pool }
= ((45 + 3.5) × (20 + 3.5)) - (45 × 20)
= (48.5×23.5) - (45 × 20)
= 1139.75 - 900
= 239.75 square meters
Now the cost is
= 239.75 × 25
= Rs. 5993.75
Typically, the<u> laissez-faire</u> style of a leader avoids dominating groups.
In French, "laissez-faire" literally means "let someone do what they want". The origins of laissez-faire are associated with his group of 18th-century French economists, the Physiocrats, who believed that government policy should not interfere with the running of the natural economy.
An example of laissez-faire is the economic policies of capitalist countries. An example of laissez-faire is when homeowners can grow whatever they want in their front yard without asking for a city permit. Do not interfere in the affairs of others.
Disclaimer: Learn more about laissez-faire here brainly.com/question/17259480
#SPJ4
Answer:
acid-test ratio 1,4044
Explanation:
We are asked for a variation ofthe current ratio
whie current ratio is determinate like:
the acid-test will remove inventory from the current assets, leaving only cash, marketable securities and accounts receivables considered for the calculations:
191,000 current assets - 85,000 inventory = 106,000
136,000 current liabilities
191,600 / 136,000 = 1,4044
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
