The glacial budget refers to the input of water to the output of water. The input is when people put water in the glacier and the output is when the glacier starts to evaporate.
Claim: This process uses expensive fertilizers and pesticides to grow pest free crops which may be produced in excess. Explain the reasons why people would go against growing wheat this way.
Your answer: Here are 3 reasons that go against growing wheat this way.
1. The fertilizers and pesticides are expensive and cost farmers a lot which takes away from the revenue that farmers make from growing the crops in the first place.
2. Other then fertilizers and Pesticides its a lot of work as you can see on the chart throughout the year there are many things you must do too keep crops bug free and pest free this reason I'm explaining says that taking and doing all of this work for not pests/bugs is too much and not needed.
3. Fungicide Is needed a lot and incredibly expensive when you used/spray it on crops that much and point goes a lot more for large crops too.
If these reasons don't work, find factors that or counterclaims that go against this method of harvesting wheat. (This is what your supposed too do)
Streams that flow beneath melting glaciers leave long ridges of layered sediments, known as Esker. Eskers are formed within ice-walled tunnels by streams which flowed within and under glaciers. They tended to form around the time of the glacial maximum when the glacier was slow and sluggish and after the retaining ice walls melted away, stream deposits remained as long winding ridges.
A lack of health resources!
