1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anon25 [30]
3 years ago
12

Cagney and Lacey enter into a written contract to open a bookstore specializing in detective novels. The written contract is a 2

-paragraph handwritten document, and states that each party will receive 50% of any net profits and that each will devote 30 hours a week to the business. Both parties regard the writing as a final expression of their deal. After being in business for a while, Cagney sues Lacey for breach because Lacey is only working 20 hours per week during the summer months. Lacy attempts to present evidence that shows just prior to signing the contract, Cagney orally agreed that Lacey could work 20 hours a week when her children were on vacation from school. Will Lacey be able to present this evidence at trial?
Law
1 answer:
Yuliya22 [10]3 years ago
4 0
Um please provide pictures
You might be interested in
The U.S Constitution has been altered by a number of amendments, such as the Twenty-Sixth Amendment that addresses
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

C. Voting age

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court, what must you do?
Tom [10]

Answer:

I will file a complaint and 'serve' a copy of the complaint to the defendant.

Explanation:

In order to initiate a civil lawsuit in a federal court or in a state court involves the following process.

First, FILING OF COMPLAINTS; the plaintiff files a complaint with the court and “serves” a copy of the complaint on the defendant.

The plaintiff may seek money to compensate for the damages, or may ask the court to order the defendant to stop the conduct that is causing the harm.

Second, THE CASE PREPARATION; litigants must provide information to each other about the case, such as the identity of witnesses and copies of any documents related to the case.

And the trial process.

6 0
3 years ago
Which source would be the MOST biased when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency, compared to past presidents?
vfiekz [6]

Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members

Other biased sources include the following:

  • Political party members of the President,
  • Previous schools the current President attended,
  • Family of the current President
  • The political party the President belonged to,
  • The special assistants to the current President, etc.

The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239

3 0
2 years ago
Can someone please help me with a Forensic Science question?
Arte-miy333 [17]

hope this helps you

below pic has a lot of information on this its very useful

5 0
3 years ago
Is it possible to balance individual rights and personal freedoms with social control and respect for legitimate authority? Why
8090 [49]

A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.

<h3>What are individual rights?</h3>

Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.

<h3>What is control and authority?</h3>

Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.

In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.

Learn more about individual rights in: brainly.com/question/619133

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Laws that cover individuals who are injured by a product
    7·1 answer
  • How long do you have to be together for common law marriage
    8·1 answer
  • 3. In your own words, explain the phrase "widening the net means. What might be
    6·1 answer
  • Do fingerprints lie?
    14·2 answers
  • What state court are courts of record ?
    14·1 answer
  • What secretary is second in command to the president in military matters
    14·2 answers
  • Por que los derechos humanos son imprescriptibles​
    9·1 answer
  • If a minor is served alcoholic beverages, who is legally responsible?
    6·2 answers
  • HAMSTER ON A PIANO DONT ANSWER THIS PLEASE
    10·2 answers
  • 2. Depressants are very similar to the effects of alcohol.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!