1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
2 years ago
12

The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school

student whose locker was searched after school officials had reason to believe she was distributing drugs and cigarettes. She was found guilty and sentenced to a one-year probation. TLO appealed the decision and the NJ Supreme Court decided that her 4th Amendment rights (which protect a person’s home, belongings and body from being searched without just cause) had been violated. However, the US Supreme Court reversed that ruling: “the Court held that while the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable warrantless searches of students under their authority notwithstanding the probable cause standard that would normally apply to searches under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the search of T.L.O.'s purse was reasonable under the circumstances”.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision? Why or why not? In your answer, discuss the Fourth Amendment, how it applies to this case, and whether or not you agree with the final verdict.
Law
1 answer:
svetlana [45]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

No, because a school official can claim a search is warranted when in reality the official could search you because of a hunch and search personal property causing potential property damage and causing the student much distress.

You might be interested in
How frequently do you think corruption and misconduct occur in policing? Why?​
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

Depends on what people think this is an opinionated question but here is what I thinks:

Explanation:

Not very often; as of 2020 with the murder of George Floyd people are way more decisive on police officers and how they do there job. This does not happen often. Up to many times of people saying corruption and police brutality there has been proof of someone handeling a gun, not co-operating, or being a threat. Im not saying it does ot happen but we need to look deeper than what we see and think.

5 0
2 years ago
Clients who feel that they have suffered damages as a result of a professional's breach of his or her duty of care can bring a n
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

b. malpractice

Explanation:

Malpractice, or professional negligence, refers to a case of incompetence on the part of a professional. A case of malpractice usually occurs when a client feels that a professional breached his or her duty of care. Some of the professionals that can be accused of malpractice are medical professionals, lawyers, accountants, stockbrokers and architects.

8 0
3 years ago
What is article 12 in the UAE law book?
Snezhnost [94]
Idk the answer sorry
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Savings accounts typically offer more interest tha what type of account?
Darina [25.2K]
Money market account: typically earns more interest than a regular savings account in exchange for higher balance requirements; some provide check-writing privileges and ATM access. Certificate of deposit: usually has the highest interest rate among savings accounts and the most limited access to funds.
5 0
3 years ago
I need 5 claims against gun control laws.
djyliett [7]

Answer:

1. we already have laws

2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)

3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun

4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)

5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc

Explanation:

for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If you have held a learner's license for more than three months, you may NOT drive _____.
    8·2 answers
  • In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had denied Furman the right
    8·2 answers
  • Why is the six amendment not directly applicable to the states ?
    8·1 answer
  • Is death penalty moral or immoral?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the options are identification procedures which occur before a trial?
    11·1 answer
  • What are three customs you practice
    8·2 answers
  • Marijuana is against the law because it is considered?
    5·1 answer
  • Name three reasons for the growth of constitutional governments during the
    14·1 answer
  • A political pattern, recurrent in world history, in which common people who feel oppressed or disadvantaged seek to take power f
    11·1 answer
  • If there was a robbery 4 weeks ago and the body was found yesterday, and the police just noticed. Who’s to blame for the crime??
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!