In Erikson's theory, the infants earliest task is described as that of:
learning trust or mistrust
The merits of electing versus appointing particular officials are widely debated, the people who debates them and support the elected positions state that the elections for a position ensure them transparency in the process and that the people elected is well know for the votants and that gives them a sense that their needs and desires, as citizens will be fullfiled, on the other hand the people that support the appointed positions state that, the elections are deprioritizes the required quantitative skills and encourages bureaucratic cronyism, they believe that the people that is appointed has the needed skills and will fullfil the people's needs.
Answer:
essketit i think
Explanation:
aundre manson is this aundre from aga its hexter
Answer:
a. The residential property owner and developer have moved to the nuisance and remedies vary.
Explanation:
Ergonomics was in the area(1967) before the residential properties or projects(1999) came about. Therefore the residential occupants could be said to have moved into the nuisance, knowing full(not being aware not an excuse however) well that Ergonomics was operation in the same area. They would based on this get a different remedial result from a law suit that would only based on consideration for safety of residential occupants of the area.
Answer:
Take a village and divide the population in two, with an experimental group that will be given a different diet, and a control group which will continue with their normal diet.
Explanation:
In experiment design, when we want to test whether or not certain factor actually has a real effect on a population, one of the best methods to follow is to split the population in two groups: an experimental group, where we will apply the treatment, and a control group, where either a placebo or no treatment at all will be applied. The advantage of having both an experimental and a control group is that this way we can ascertain with much more clarity whether a change in the indepent variable (the treatment) has an observable effect on the dependent variable (the effect on the population).
In our example, a practical manner to test whether longevity in Russian Georgian villages is due to genetic or dietary factors, is to take one of the villages, and split the population in two groups: an experimental group, that will be given a higher calorie diet, and a control group, which will continue to consume their normal low-calorie diet. Then we would track the differences in age expectancy over time. If after a long enough period of time there's a difference in longevity between both groups, in other words, whether one of them leads longer or shorter lives than the other, then we can conclude that our test has proven that diet has a definitive effect on their longevity. If there's no significant difference, then we can conclude that diet has no relevance and it's all due to genetics.
