Answer:
<EAB and <CAD
<CAB and <DAE
Step-by-step explanation:
Time is continuous.
If it was possible to measure EXACTLY the time it
takes a person (or group of people) to evaluate 27 + 72 (=99), the
time(s) people took could be 2 seconds, 3 seconds, 2.5 seconds, 2.25
seconds, 2.22 seconds, 2.2199999 seconds... In other words, any value is
possible when measuring "exact" time elapsed.
However, people are
limited by the tools they use. There isn't a tool without limits in its
ability to measure time elapsed. For example, is the stopwatch accurate
to 1/100th of a second? 1/1000th of a second? At some point it reaches
its limit. The constraints of the tool being used to measure are going
to, in fact, cause data to be "discrete."
I'm 90% sure you're
teacher is looking for "continuous" as the solution though. So don't
bring up "discrete" unless you feel like you'll be able to confidently
explain the second paragraph above.
Based off of what I can see in the photo (its too blurry to know for sure) and what I think you're asking:
The angle of a triangle always adds up to 360degrees, so base it on that and the acute and obtuse angles and get the degrees from there, the angle would be those degrees you find or <10, 5, 4 (what I assume is a 5)
Answer:
other side is 12
Step-by-step explanation:
Givens
Perimeter = 64 feet
L = 20
Formula
P = 2L + 2w Substitute Givens
64 = 2*20 + 2w Combine
64 = 40 + 2w Subtract 40 from both sides
64-40 = 40-40+2w Combine
24 = 2w Divide both sides by 2
24/2=2w/2
12 = w
