1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flauer [41]
3 years ago
5

Help me please it’s an emergency

Mathematics
2 answers:
Iteru [2.4K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

140°

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that angle a is 40 degrees, angle b = 140 degrees

because a triangle is half of a square

and a square is 360 degrees so a triangle is 180 degrees

so 180 - 40 = 140

Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

50 degrees

Step-by-step explanation: we know that

If two angles are complementary, then their sum is equal to 90 degrees so A+B=90° we have A=40° substitute and solve for B 40°+B=90° B=90°-40°=50°

You might be interested in
HELP ME PLEASE!!!!! ASAP
Lera25 [3.4K]
So, you subtract 68 from 54 and you get your answer. probably wrong. if I am correct me or tell me.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
52
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

45hjshb

Step-by-step explanation:

gshzlv lbxdphdppudlljxjlxlgz

3 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Beware of these answeres never click on it it’s a hacker
ollegr [7]

Answer:

yes true I once made a post like this but the mods deleted it before I could put it up lol XD

7 0
2 years ago
I need the answer ;(
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

x=100

Step-by-step explanation:

Because they are vertical angles, AEG=FEB

You can see that FED+DEB=FEB

Therefore, 80+20=FEB=100

Since FEB=100 and FEB=AEG

AEG=100

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can someone please help
    8·1 answer
  • 2/3x - 4 = -2<br><br> please reply as soon as possible!
    15·2 answers
  • Explain how to divide 0.27 by 0.03
    7·1 answer
  • A space for storing boxes is 36 inches high. Each box is 6 inches high. A space of 9 inches must be left at the top. what is the
    15·1 answer
  • Jake needs 7.59 meters of wood to complete a school project. He buys a 2.21−meter plank of wood and a 3.12−meter plank of wood.
    15·1 answer
  • I desperately need the answers to this, it’s about compound interests
    13·1 answer
  • Find the Area of the figure below, composed of a rectangle and a semicircle. Round to the nearest tenths place.
    10·1 answer
  • How much money should I save for a big, state to state, road trip?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help with these two questions ASAP, will give BRAINLIEST!
    11·2 answers
  • What shap can you make with these
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!