Use the data set to answer questions 1-3.

Mathematics

1 answer:

xxTIMURxx [149]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Q3 = 37.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Place the data items in order from least to greatest

5, 8, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45

Find the number in the middle 25

Then take the number on the right, take the two numbers in the very middle add them together and divide by 2. 35+40 = 75/2 =37.5

If you don't have to show your worK:

TI84 calculator [stat][edit]input data [stat][calc][1-var stats]{list:L1][enter][enter]scroll down till Q3

You might be interested in

What is $20.00 less than 2.5 times the amount of $64.80

Lera25 [3.4K]

Ok so first you take $64.80 and multiply it by 2.5. You get $162. Now take $162 and subtract $20 from it. You are left with $142.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A graph has time (years) on the x-axis and height (inches) on the y-axis. A line goes through points (2, 5) and (4, 10).

Sergeu [11.5K]

Answer:

2.5 inches per year

Step-by-step explanation:

We can deduce the rate of change by obtaining the slope or gradient of thw points given :

Gradient = Rise / Run.

Point A (2, 5) ; point B (4, 10)

x1 = 2 ; y1 = 5 ;x2 = 4 ; y2 = 10

Rise = y2 - y1 = 10 - 5 = 5

Run = x2 - x1 = 4 - 2 = 2

Rate of change = Gradient = 5 /2 = 2.5

Which is 2.5 inches per year

4 0

3 years ago

You are considering the purchase of a closed circuit TV monitoring system for your store. The quarterly physical inventory has s

Tcecarenko [31]

If quarterly shrinkage (every 3 months) is 2.5%, then multiplying by $875,495 gives a value of 21887.38, or an average monthly shrinkage of 21887.38 / 3 = $7,295.79.For an employee to monitor the CCTV, it would cost ($7.5/h)(11 h/d)(30 d/m) = $2,475/month. Therefore, it is much cheaper (around 2/3 cheaper) to have an employee monitor CCTV rather than to allow the high shrinkage rate.

7 0

4 years ago

Can you hlep me hhhhhh

hram777 [196]

Answer:

The answer is 8 please Brainlist me

Step-by-step explanation:

6^2+h^2=10^2

36+h^2=100

Solving for h gives 8

4 0

3 years ago