Answer: FALSE
Explanation: The garden of Eden style of thinking is mythological style of thinking: people who believes that things not seen and has no prove of trace, has actually existed.
For someone to be skeptical means the person doesn't accept information easily, such person will always want to verify the information by asking more questions, so he can understand how the information is interrelated with the fact known.
This means that if a person rejects the mythological view of the garden of Eden, it is not certain that such person is highly skeptical, because such person may accept the mythological view of the existence of heaven and hell. Such person may only be skeptical about one thing and may not be skeptical about another thing, this means the person is not highly skeptical.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
yes they should be taught to be proud of their country
Explanation:
- Many people who are not patriotic tend to think that their country does not have the capability of helping him learn his career so he decides to go to another country only to later realize that his country had the resource and was actually better
- already gave an example in 1
- I have talked to many children here in my African country and they all dream to go to big cities like New York or London but don't realize that with their labour they could make their countries city bigger than that London they dream of.Children of civil servants are actually patriotic since they see their parents benefiting from their country. there are others who don't even know their country well and this is disappointing.
- I disagree with the parents who actually encourage their children to go to other countries so as to send a lot of money home yet they don't realize how hard it is to cope with a currency that akes your hard earned money look like spare change and later come home broke when they could have become big business men and women if they had stayed and worked
