1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eva8 [605]
4 years ago
6

Which of these excerpts from poems by Emily Dickinson uses irony? My cocoon tightens, colors tease, I'm feeling for the air; A d

im capacity for wings Degrades the dress I wear. Could she have guessed that it would be; Could but a crier of the glee Have climbed the distant hill; Had not the bliss so slow a pace, — Who knows but this surrendered face Were undefeated still? One dignity delays for all, One mitred afternoon. None can avoid this purple, None evade this crown. There's a certain slant of light, On winter afternoons, That oppresses, like the weight Of cathedral tunes. Heavenly hurt it gives us; We can find no scar, But internal difference Where the meanings are. Exultation is the going Of an inland soul to sea, — Past the houses, past the headlands, Into deep eternity!
English
2 answers:
jarptica [38.1K]4 years ago
7 0
Exultation is the going
Of an inland soul to sea, —
Past the houses, past the headlands,
<span>Into deep eternity!
i hope this helps
</span>
zaharov [31]4 years ago
7 0
Well In my opinion, the whole poem is quite ironic - although she is mentioning the exultation and the royal color of death, the poem itself begins with the narrator saying that she cannot breathe - that she doesn't want to die.
So, I would say that the ironic parts are: 
Exultation is the going
Of an inland soul to sea, -
Past the houses, past the headlands,
Into deep eternity
You might be interested in
20 Points!!!!! Easy Question! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR GOOD ANSWER!!!!! : )
Fittoniya [83]
<span>As the fiscal year comes to a close, it’s well worth our time to take a close look at the way local
governments are budgeting tax dollars. With high unemployment rates and rising rents and
food costs across the nation, every one of those dollars matters immensely—and none of them
should be wasted on funding for public art.  I’ll be the first to admit that, even during difficult economic times, </span>

<span>people need the arts to offer commentary, philosophy, and amusement. I am, in fact, a great supporter of the arts, and I regularly donate to arts organizations. The arts need money; they just don’t need government
money.
      Cutting government funding for public art frees up tax dollars for indispensable government
necessities that protect the safety and well-being of citizens, such as road building and
maintenance, healthcare, housing, and education. Directing would-be arts funding into other
programs is not only beneficial for those areas in need of more crucial government support; it is
also good for artists and the art itself.
     Art is, by its very nature, expressive and controversial. The best art represents an individual
point of view that is critical, imaginative, and eye-opening. This kind of ingenuity requires
freedom and independence on the part of the artist. When the government provides funding
for public art projects, the artist loses freedom. When using public funds, the artist is
constrained by the need to represent the point of view of the government and to gratify the
general public. There are countless stories of public art pieces being altered, censored, or even
destroyed when the public exerted its authority over the work. Naturally, this situation results
in a loss of personal freedom for the artist and an abundance of mediocre public artwork.
The financial solution to producing high-quality, provocative art is private funding. If we allow
the market to drive the production of art, artists and art-lovers will have a greater influence on
the art being created and shown to the public. Already, private funding accounts for most art
being created in America. In 2008, a record-breaking 858 million public dollars was spent on the
arts by local governments in the United States. This sum pales in comparison to the 12.79
billion private dollars donated to the arts in the same year. And the high number of private
dollars donated to artists is of course supplemented by the money that collectors spend on
buying art in auction houses and galleries. Statistics show us that art can and does flourish
without public funding. In fact, for centuries great masterpieces have been created without
government money. Masters such as Shakespeare and Leonardo da Vinci had private funders,
and their masterpieces continue to influence generations around the world.
     In light of this evidence, I offer a strong suggestion for the coming fiscal year: Let’s stop the
move towards government-funded public art projects and encourage private donors to invest in
the creation of high-quality, uncensored art. We don’t need public art pieces that incite
controversy, upset some of the taxpayers who helped pay for them, and give the government
the power of censorship. We need public funding to provide the necessities of health, safety, and education to our nation’s citizens. We also need a thriving private art market that allows
artists financial independence and freedom of expression.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read It!
timama [110]

Answer:

C, genders

Explanation:

The women spoke Arawak, the men spoke Carib

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Alec Blackmon stated that. "the use of the printing press during the seventeenth century enabled the emergence of newspapers,
mixer [17]
I think it is A.<span>Ever since the seventeenth century, newspapers contain information, news, and advertisements. 
B) In the seventeenth century, the use of the printing press led to the emergence of newspapers. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the Coriolis effect make ocean currents appear to move?
tangare [24]

Answer:

the answer is b bestieee

Explanation:

goodluck

6 0
3 years ago
Which sentence contains a misplaced or dangling modifier?
Setler79 [48]
<span>C) The homecoming queen waved to the crowd riding in her convertible.

It is phrased as if the entire crowd is riding in her convertible, which is impossible and unlikely.
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some critics of Hedda Gabler believe that Hedda is pregnant. Which of the following supports this view? Select all that apply.
    7·2 answers
  • Who are Tillotson and Ampleforth? *<br> Winston's friends<br> Winston's coworkers<br> Jailers
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best illustrates Parris’s character? He is more concerned with how people will react when they learn that there
    10·2 answers
  • The easiest and most effective delivery mode for most speakers is
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!! Is the second question correct?
    11·1 answer
  • Help asap please only tell me the answers!!​
    8·1 answer
  • What does acronym "SODA" stand for?
    12·2 answers
  • YOOOOO i need some essay help
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a one of the ethical standards for judging the moral correctness of a speech?
    7·1 answer
  • Which form is the closest to human speech?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!