Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
Paternalistic social responsibility refers to acts whereby managers provide for the essential needs of the employees such as providing them with accommodation facilities along with satisfying other needs such as food.
Henri Ford was among the first initiators of such a responsibility when he provided health programs and recreational services to his employees.
Building town homes with provision for food by employer is an example of paternalistic social responsibility.
Answer:
When materials, information, and services gain value as they move from the raw-materials supplier to the end customer, they are said to be moving through ________.
A. the supply chain
B. a value-added analysis
C. business process re-engineering
D. Total Quality Management (TQM)
E. just-in-time production
Answer: A
Explanation:
A supply chain is a system between an organization and its providers to create and appropriate a particular item to the last purchaser. This system incorporates various exercises, individuals, elements, data, and assets. The supply chain additionally speaks to the means it takes to get the item or administration from its unique state to the client. Organizations create supply chains so they can diminish their expenses and stay serious in the business scene. Supply chain the board is a pivotal procedure on the grounds that an enhanced supply chain brings about lower costs and a quicker creation cycle. A supply chain includes a progression of steps required to get an item or administration to the client. The means incorporate moving and changing crude materials into completed items, shipping those items, and conveying them to the end-client. The substances associated with the supply chain incorporate makers, merchants, stockrooms, transportation organizations, appropriation focuses, and retailers.
The answer is C. Hoped this helped you
Local income taxes. Other taxes like federal income tax would go to nationwide programs. Medicare tax goes towards national health care, etc. Local income taxes will go towards city programs
The Kelo case proved to be a revelation for many New Londoners about their property rights.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Dera editor,
Small business owners have to be careful to avoid falling under the radar of government development projects.
Until now, I was under the impression that eminent domain gave the government the right to take private property as long as it was for public use.
My assumption included that public use defined anything that the public could literally use. Apparently, the court went with a broader interpretation of public use under which “a taking is constitutional if it serves a public purpose” (Kelo v. City of New London).
This interpretation means public use includes anything that is deemed fit for public purpose, even though I or most citizens may not be able to directly use it.
This raises the concern of what all could fall under public use. I trust that the government won’t go on seizing private properties for its unrestrained use. However, the Kelo case still proves to be a matter of concern for me.
Learn more about eminent domain on:
brainly.com/question/9308155
#SPJ1
