Answer: $952500
Explanation: targeted equity ratio is 65% = 0.65
Capital budget = $850000
Dividend = net income - (target equity ratio × total budget)
400000 = N - (0.65 × 850000)
Make N the subject of formula
Net income N = $952,500
Answer:
$9.63
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Year Annual dividend paid
1 $1.20
2 $1.12
3 $1.12
4 $14.20
Now,
Year Annual dividend paid Present value factor Present value
1 $1.20 0.84246 1.011
2 $1.12 0.84246 0.7949
3 $1.12 0.59793 0.6696
4 $14.20 0.50373 7.1529
===============================================================
Worth of stock = 1.011 + 0.7949 + 0.6696 + 7.1529
= $9.6284 ≈ $9.63
Note:
Present value factor = [ 1 ÷ (1 + 0.187)ⁿ]
here,
n is the year
Answer:
The share is worth $5.68 today.
Explanation:
The current price of the stock can be calculated using the DDM or dividend discount model. The DDM values the stock based on the present value of the expected future dividends from the stock.
The following is the formula for the price of the stock today,
P0 = D1 / (1+r) + D2 / (1+r)^2 + ... + Dn / (1+r)^n + Terminal value / (1+r)^n
The terminal value is the cumulative value of all the future dividends calculated when the dividend growth becomes zero or constant. In case the dividend growth becomes constant, like in this case, the terminal value is calculated as follows,
Terminal value = Dn * (1+g) / r - g
Where,
- g is the Constant growth rate in dividends
So, the price of this stock today is,
P0 = 0.65 / (1+0.145) + 0.70 / (1+0.145)^2 + 0.75 / (1+0.145)^3 +
((0.75 * (1+0.02) / (0.145 - 0.02)) / (1+0.145)^3
P0 = $5.678 rounded off to $5.68
Answer:
$27,500
Explanation:
Revenue from the sale of Product C = $36 × 2500
= $90,000
Cost to produce Product C = $14 × 2500
= $35,000
Revenue from the sale of Product M = $47 × 2500
= $117,500
Differential Total Net Revenue of producing Product M
= $117,500 - $90,000
= $27,500
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
