Answer:
Type I error: Concluding that mean mileage is less than 32 miles per hour when actually it is greater than or equal to 32 miles per gallon.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Hypothesis:
Mean mileage for the Carter Motor Company's new sedan
We can design the null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis as:
Type I error:
- It is the false positive error.
- It is the error of rejection a true hypothesis.
Type II error:
- It is the false negative error.
- It is the non rejection of a false null hypothesis.
Thus, type I error for the given hypothesis is concluding that mean mileage is less than 32 miles per hour when actually it is greater than or equal to 32 miles per gallon.
Type II error would be concluding that mean mileage is greater than or equal to 32 miles per gallon when actually it is less than 32 miles per gallon.
Statement:
1. RS tangent to Circle A and Circle B at points R and S
2. AR ⊥ RS, BS ⊥ RS
3. AR ║ BS
Reason:
1. Given
2. Radius ⊥ to tangent
3. 2 lines ⊥ to same line are ║
100% Correct
~Hope it helps~ :)
Answer:
The equation does not have a real root in the interval ![\rm [0,1]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20%5B0%2C1%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can make use of the intermediate value theorem.
The theorem states that if 
is a continuous function whose domain is the interval [a, b], then it takes on any value between f(a) and f(b) at some point within the interval. There are two corollaries:
- If a continuous function has values of opposite sign inside an interval, then it has a root in that interval. This is also known as Bolzano's theorem.
- The image of a continuous function over an interval is itself an interval.
Of course, in our case, we will make use of the first one.
First, we need to proof that our function is continues in , which it is since every polynomial is a continuous function on the entire line of real numbers. Then, we can apply the first corollary to the interval , which means to evaluate the equation in 0 and 1:
Since both values have the same sign, positive in this case, we can say that by virtue of the first corollary of the intermediate value theorem the equation does not have a real root in the interval . I attached a plot of the equation in the interval ![\rm [-2,2]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20%5B-2%2C2%5D)
where you can clearly observe how the graph does not cross the x-axis in the interval.
Answer:x=4
Step-by-step explanation:
