A lot. Sadly there are also a lot of Americans who believe that everything will just be handed to them. You must earn what you want.
The Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.
Hope this helped
Answer:
Extensive social regulation may have an anticompetitive effect.
Explanation:
Social regulation refers to a series of public policies, rules, and laws, implemented by a government that try to determine or influence some economic or social activities. Social regulations are often used with specific goals in mind, such as promoting equality, restrict harmful practices, and protect certain sectors of the population, the environment, etc. However, a side effect of regulatiosn is that they might have an anticompetitive effect. That is, they can discourage private activity because the costs of abiding by the regulations might be seem as too high by some actors, thus preferring to stand aside; also, regulations can distort free markets, leading to distortions in prices and misallocation of resources. On the other hand, often times the costs of social regulations are often easier to measure than their benefits. This is because the costs can be directly measured by the amount of money regulations costs to the government and enterprises, while benefits are more often than not indirect, so there are no immediate indicators for how beneficial regulations can be.
Answer:
Downward comparison
Explanation:
The theory of social comparison proposes that people tend to compare themselves with other people who are similar to themselves. They also make upward social comparisons (with people who are superior) in hopes of learning how to improve.
However, sometimes people want to feel better about themselves and they make downward comparisons, which is, they make comparisons with others who are inferior to, or less fortunate than them in some way. They do this in order to feel better.
In this example, when a natural disaster causes severe damage people say "at least, unlike what happened to others, we survived or we have a home to return to". We can see that <u>they are comparing themselves with others who are less fortunate (who didn't survive or lost their homes), in order to feel better about what happened to them</u>. Therefore, this is an example of downward comparison.
They established colonies in both Vietnam<span> and </span>Cambodia<span>.</span>