Sam's is liable for defamation statement is true.
<u>Option: A</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The vice president of public relations in Sam's Sandwiches issued the following false statement regarding the type of meat the Hamburger Hamlets, Inc use in there fast food products like burger. This showcase the defamation form Sam's side, which is the verbal or written transmission of a false statement about someone else that unjustly damages their image and is typically a felony or a punishment.
Diffamation law only finds defamatory claims if they are, in reality, false. A real assertion is not regarded as slander. In fact, expressions of belief are not assumed inaccurate because of their existence, since they are specific to the speaker.
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
If the Federal bank sells securities to a bond dealer, the dealer will need to pay back the Fed. This will cause a reduction in the dealer's bank's transaction deposits liabilities.
A reduction in deposits liabilities will further cause a reduction in the total reserves of the bank. Consequently, it will cause a decrease in the money supply. In this way, the federal reserve bank can curb inflationary pressures.
Answer:
The bad debt expense which should be recorded in the income statement for the year 2019, amounts to $127,600
Explanation:
The bad debt expense which should be recorded in the income statement for the year 2019 is computed as:
= Net Credit Sales × Uncollectible credit sales for the year 2019
where
Net Credit Sales is $290,000
Uncollectible credit sales for the year 2019 is 44%
Putting the values in the above formula:
= $290,000 × 44%
= $127,600
Answer:
The correct answer is 0.06317911524 or 6.3%.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
FV = $2
PV = $1
Time period (t)= 11 years
So, we can calculate the rate of interest by using following fomula:
FV=PV ( 1 + r ÷12)^12t
By putting the value, we get
$2 = $1 ( 1 + r ÷ 12)^(12 × 11
$2^(1 ÷ 132) = 1 + r ÷ 12
r ÷ 12 = (1.00526492627 - 1)
r = 0.00526492627× 12
= 0.06317911524 or 6.3%
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
