Answer:
A. A contingent remainder.
Explanation:
A contingent remainder refers to a legal transfer of property that could only occurs after one specific circumstances mentioned by the original owner rather than the death of original owner itself.
From the case above, the children only receive the property only if the wife of the original owner has passed away (this is the specific circumstances)
Among the choices provide above, the issue-oriented interest group promotes environmental causes is the Sierra Club. <span>The Sierra Club is an environmental organization in the United States. It was founded on May 28, 1892, in San Francisco, California, by the Scottish-American preservationist John Muir, who became its first president.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
The answer would be B, Portugal.
Bartolomeu Dias, a Portuguese explorer, was the first (well, the first European) to get around the Cape. Originally, he had named it the "Cabo das Tormentas" or "Cape of Storms", because of how rough the water was.
It was later rechristened the "Cabo da Boa Esperanca" or "Cape of Good Hope" by the Portuguese king, John II, because he believed that they had found a possible passage to the East.
SPOILERS: He was right.
The correct answer is A. There was neither a violation of privacy nor a breach of confidentiality
Explanation:
In research, confidentiality refers to the responsibility of the researcher to avoid revealing the identity of the research subjects, this concept is linked to privacy because by avoiding revealing the identity of subjects, the researcher guarantees private information about individuals is not revealed, this includes individuals' preferences, opinions, personal experiences, and ideas. Considering this, in the case presented it can be concluded neither the privacy nor the confidentiality was violated because even though the file contains information about the subjects this is only numerical information and does not relate to their private life or reveals their identity. Therefore, the statement that characterizes the situation is "There was neither a violation of privacy nor a breach of confidentiality".