Hey there!
Essentially in this quote, Boris Yelstin was stating that when the situation is critical, and in all times- people should have the freedom to think their own thoughts. Part of thinking your own thoughts is religion because your own thoughts are what you believe in- and that's your religion.
Therefore, your answer is B, freedom of belief- because he's talking about people should be able to have their own thoughts, and a thought can be a belief.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
<h3>a. if there had been no damage or cleaning required, which seemed highly unlikely in bob’s case, the landlord should have refunded his security deposit within 21 days of bob’s vacating the property.</h3>
Explanation:
- According to lease termination or surrender and acceptance of the premises, the dateline to return security deposit as provided in state's security deposit statutes is within a month or 21 days.
- In case if a lease agreement specifies a longer period of time for the return of the security deposit, the tenant must forward a demand letter, which applies in both lease termination and lease agreement, and comply with the dateline as specified in the agreement.
- However in Bob's case, if there is no case of such agreement that specifies a longer period of time for the return of security deposit. Therefore, the landlord should have refunded the security deposit within 21 days given that Bob has left the apartment in perfect condition.
To use the positive reinforcement to increase the time Danny spent in playing outside, Anna should allow Danny some extra computer time for every minute that he will play outside. This way, Danny will get the reward, which is having an extra computer time if he will play outside.
To convert 23 centimeters to inches, divide the length value by 2.54
Why?
- One inch is equal to 2.54 centimeters
1 inch=2.54 centimeters
23 centimeters ÷ 2.54 centimeters = 9.05512 inches
9.05512 inches ≈ 9.1 inches
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy, who was 1/8 African American, tried to ride in a "whites only" train car, violating a Louisiana law that separate amenities must be provided for people of different races. The Court found that separate accommodations were allowed by the "privileges and immunities" and "equal protection" clauses of the fourteenth amendment as long as they were comparable in quality.
