Answer: 1. Justinian himself planted the seeds for the Byzantine Empire's decline. First, his constant wars and the rebuilding of Constantinople after the Nika Riot caused serious financial problems for the empire. The reconstruction of the Hagia Sophia alone cost about 320,000 pounds of gold
2. Invading forces contribute to the fall of the Byzantine empire by weakening the empire.
3. The Macedonian Dynasty saw the Byzantine Renaissance, a time of increased interest in classical scholarship and the assimilation of classical motifs into Christian artwork.
4. The Nicaean Empire eventually recovered Constantinople and restored the Byzantine Empire in 1261. The Fourth Crusade is considered to have solidified the East-West Schism. The crusade dealt an irrevocable blow to the Byzantine Empire, contributing to its decline.
5. Trade with the Venetians contributed to the fall of the Byzantine Empire in ways both direct and indirect. Because Venice was able to negotiate such favorable terms in their trade contracts with Constantinople, there arose bitter anti-Venice sentiment in the Eastern Empire.
Explanation:
I hope this helps in some way shape or form good luck on your upcoming classes !
The legal challenges contribute to the decline of Reconstruction when President Lincoln announced that there is a plan for reconstructing the Confederate states which are already under the Union control. He proposed to excuse the Confederate who took a pledge to support the Union.
<span>Answer:
Amid the twelfth and thirteenth hundreds of years, colleges emerged in the real European urban communities. These colleges took care of the demand for training in the seven human sciences—language structure, talk, rationale, cosmology, geometry, number-crunching, and music—instruction that turned into a critical way to professional success. Colleges gaining practical experience in the higher orders—law at Bologna, pharmaceutical at Salerno, and religious philosophy and theory at Paris—moved toward becoming places for scholarly civil argument. The twelfth century philosophical school known as Scholasticism grew new frameworks of rationale in light of Europeans' rediscovery of Aristotle from Islamic and Jewish sources. Researchers faced off regarding how people can know truth—regardless of whether learning of truth happens through confidence, through human reason and examination, or through some mix of the two means. Albeit none of these researchers denied Christian truth as it was uncovered in the Bible, a few, for example, Anselm of Canterbury, set confidence before reason. Others, for example, Peter Abelard, put reason first. The colossal thirteenth century Dominican savant Thomas Aquinas delivered a splendid union of confidence and reason, while a gathering of rationalists called nominalists addressed whether human dialect could precisely depict reality. These investigation into the idea of information added to logical request, clear in the test hypotheses of English researcher and thinker Roger Bacon (1214?- 1294).
In the mean time, many individuals looked for a more otherworldly, all encompassing knowledge of the world than what was offered through the insightfulness or through standard church customs. Visionaries and reformers made new requests, for example, the Cistercians, Franciscans, and Dominicans. Holy person Francis of Assisi rejected the urban realism of his folks and nearby church. He built up a vagabond, or hobo, way of life for the supporters of his congregation endorsed arrange—Franciscan monks for men and the Poor Clares for ladies. Numerous religious scholars in the 1200s were affected by the before reasoning of Christian Neoplatonism, a union of Plato's standards and Christian magic. Under that impact, they dismissed the Aristotelian concentrate on supporting religion and trusted God's perfect disclosure could best be comprehended through understanding. The Cistercian Bernard of Clairvaux, who passed on in 1153, expected that Abelard's academic rationale would stifle genuine profound comprehension. Afterward, Bonaventure, a Franciscan who lived from 1221 to 1274, built up a magical reasoning managing Christians toward consideration of the perfect domain of God.
Well known religion additionally mirrored this social and religious mature. A great many people in medieval Europe were Christian by submersion during childbirth and took an interest in chapel ceremonies for the duration of their lives. They did retribution for sins, went to Mass, and went on journeys to blessed locales containing relics of holy people. In the urban communities, laypeople started looking for a more extraordinary religious experience to offset the realism of their urban lives. Many were drawn into new religious developments, not which were all affirmed by the congregation. This prompted strife between chapel instructed universal lessons and practices and apostasy, convictions and practices that were denounced as false by the congregation and considered a risk to Christendom. Like the religious requests, sins, for example, the Cathars (otherwise called the Albigensians), the Waldensians, and the Spiritual Franciscans accentuated otherworldly life; be that as it may, they likewise condemned the congregation's realism and tested its power. For example, the Cathars dismissed the body as abhorrent and saw no requirement for clerics. Church pioneers censured them as apostates, while mainstream rulers, keen on stifling neighborhood uprisings against their power, completed a military campaign to crush their fortifications in southern France. The congregation, whose principle and request were debilitated by these gatherings, selected evangelists, for example, the Dominicans to educate rectify regulation and furthermore appointed inquisitors to recognize blasphemers and suggest them for discipline.</span>
The British took retribution against Native American nations that fought on the side of the French by cutting off their supplies and then forcibly compelling the tribes to obey the rules of the new mother country.
Explanation:
Congress was completely ineffective in preventing the Civil War because the Southern states still seceded. This option is best drawn because of the fact that that in the case of the 2nd option, they did not delay the war in any way. It was only a matter of time until the war happened, and nothing could have stopped it from happening. Once the Southern states made the decision to secede, the war was inevitable.
