Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.
a. Make or Buy Analysis
Particulars Make amount Buy amount
Direct Materials $4.50
Direct Labor $1.00
Overhead (80% of Direct Labor) $0.80
Cost to buy <u> </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost per unit <u>$5.70 </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70
Cost Difference = $1.00
Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.
b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.
Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.
See similar solution about Analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>
The key is efficiency. Ford and his business were captains of efficiency, from mass manufacturing via the factory line to economical individual effort. Ford Motor Company produced cars swiftly assembly line.
<h3>How a business becomes successful?</h3>
The most prosperous organizations place a high priority on providing excellent customer service and a great client experience. Making goods and services that consumers demand is the first step. However, concentrating on your clients goes beyond you products.
<h3>What does a successful business look like?</h3>
Instead of focusing on earning short-term benefits, successful businesses are focused with establishing long - term profits and creating sustainable growth. By creating new goods or services that satisfy customers, successful businesses are able to effectively address the changing wants of their clients.
To know more about Successful businesses visit:
brainly.com/question/20365163
#SPJ4
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was used to curb accounting fraud by improving financial disclosure of corporations, and checking and fixing frauds if they were found.
hope this helps
<span>The correct answer is that it depends on the specifics of the incentive plan. A general incentive plan that is not linked directly to productivity will typically become old news to staff within a few years. What was once an incentive will become familiar and may be viewed as an entitlement as staff start looking for the eternal "what's next?".
An incentive directly linked to some kind of productivity (e.g. hours worked) will have a far longer shelf life (though this will, of course, vary by employee). In this scenario the ongoing incentive remains year over year (e.g. the hours of overtime worked in the previous year will have no bearing on the current year so if you want a similar result you will need to maintain your effort whereas if you want a better result you will have to increase your effort).
All incentive plans, however, are subject to the rules of diminishing marginal utility to the employees and will diminish over time as the employee either becomes comfortable at a certain productivity level or becomes disenchanted by other factors.
In summation: an incentive plan, if designed properly, can work for a relatively long period of years though results may vary by employee as everyone is motivated by different things (though providing an alternative incentive to money may somewhat mitigate this additional potential problem).</span>
Answer:
a. Project Low because its expected rate of return is higher than its WACC
Explanation:
Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC determines firms cost of capital. It includes all sources of finance which are included in firm capital structure. The expected rate of return is the rate at which a project is able to generate return or benefits. For any project to be beneficial, its expected return should be higher than its WACC. We will select project Low because its expected rate of return is higher than its WACC.