Answer:
tediaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Explanation:
A study by Jeremy Siegal showed that since 1892, stocks have outperformed Bonds in 69% of rolling 5-year investing periods.
<h3>Do stocks outperform bonds?</h3>
According to Jeremy Siegel, they do. In fact, his research showed that since 1892, stocks have outperformed bonds 69% of the time during 5 year investment periods.
This makes sense because stocks have a higher return on bonds because they are riskier.
Find out more on stocks and bonds at brainly.com/question/20867391.
The answer is "You still might want to determine if there are any barriers to performance."
Performance gap refers to the difference between the present circumstance and the expected circumstance. Execution hole investigation enables a business to recognize how far it has come toward achieving its objectives and how far despite everything it needs to go to accomplish them, with the target of building up a solid procedure to close any current gap.
Answer:
4 Important Factors To Consider Before Investing
Risk Vs Reward. Any kind of investment would involve a certain degree of risk. ...
Individual Risk Appetite. One man's food is another man's poison – the same goes for investment. ...
Investment Capital. The amount is investment capital you have can also affect your choice of investment. ...
Time Horizon.
There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did. We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept. Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true. Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.
One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people. Roman religion was based on transactions. If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return. It was like buying something on Amazon. By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe. God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things. Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.
A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code. Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives. The gods did not care how people acted towards one another. The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave. This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.
Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature. The Roman world was very unequal. There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves. The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable. This is where Christianity was so different. It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God. Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.
Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.
