<span>The answer is C- Maintaining an individual and racial identity does not mean all people cannot work together. When he says, "we can be as separate as the fingers," he means that we can all be individuals with regard to our social characteristics, just as fingers can move independently of one another. However, as all fingers are attached to a hand, they are required to act as one unit for the progress of the group as a whole.</span>
Answer:
Lincoln's contrast of free labour and slave labour is quite different as he did not base his argument on the fact that free labourers had the conset to work for a wage and slave labourer did not.
Explanation:
- Rather he argued that the difference was that among the free labourers there was hope to escape from the current condition to a better one whereas slave labourers lacked this kind of hope.
- It is not the consent that distinguishes free labour from slave labourers but rather the independence of choice the rise to own productive property and to work for oneself.
the africans did it,.......................................
Answer:
Roosevelt was accused of Bolshevism by his opponents, and many anti-crisis methods were sharply criticized. They criticized the direction of the New Deal against business; many rightly believed that the new policy hampered the restoration of the economic system. Despite all efforts, unemployment continued to increase: if it were not for the increase in salary costs caused by the New Deal, the unemployment rate in the country as of 1940 would be lower by 8 percentage points.
Ordinary citizens were directly affected by the increase in alcohol duties and wage deductions for social security. Roosevelt further increased the tax burden by raising income tax for individuals and legal entities, excise taxes, property taxes and donated property. He introduced undistributed profit tax. All these ‘requisitions’ led to a reduction in the amount of money that entrepreneurs could spend on expanding production and creating new jobs.
Explanation:
The answer is 3)<span> Great Britain did not have the resources to maintain an empire after World War II
</span>
Even though Britain was able to defeat Germany and the Axis powers in Europe, overall the Empire was in socioeconomic shambles.
The war had resulted in the destruction of hundreds of businesses and factories. London itself was bombarded and the many government officials operated from bunkers.
Millions of men had died and there was a lack of resources.
The government could do things, use the remaining reserves to either rebuild Great Britain or maintain the large Empire. At the end it was decided to give away the Empire and work on rebuilding Britain
<span></span>
