Answer:
A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.
While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.
Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.
Explanation:
Hope this helped :)
Explanation:
state statutory and common (judge-made) law and private law.
This is a biology question
Answer:
The decisions taken by the executive agencies of the United States government determine the course of actions in the matter over which they have jurisdiction.
Thus, for example, the Federal Communications Commission is in charge of regulating matters concerning communications and transmission of information in the national territory, through radio, television, etc. It is even in charge of censoring certain sources of communication that are considered dangerous to the interests of society or national security.
Therefore, their decisions have a direct impact on individuals and groups outside the federal government, since, for example, in the event of censorship of a communication medium, said information presented by the medium in question will not reach individuals. Thus, these are protected from distorted, false or dangerous information, taking care of the normal development of the life of society.
Yes, Buildco. Legally remove mia because Mia did not report activity to the essential individuals or entities.
<h3>Whistleblower</h3>
A whistleblower is an individual, often an employee, who reveals data about activity within a private/public organization that is deemed illegal, corrupt, illicit, unsafe, or fraudulent. Whistleblowers can use a combination of internal or external channels to share information or allegations.
<h3>What is a whistleblower at work?</h3>
A whistleblower is someone who declares workplace conditions that he or she believes to be unsafe or illegal. You can't avenge a whistleblower for documenting injuries, safety concerns, or other protected activities.
To learn more about whistleblowers visit the link
brainly.com/question/10649836
#SPJ4
