Answer:
It's the first one because he can send troops to action because He/she is the commander in chief, but it must get approved by congress before he/she does.
Explanation:
The equipment which <em>hostage negotiation team members</em> should carry in their car includes:
- Writing materials.
- The dossier of the aggressors (if already established)
- Communication equipment
- First aid.
<h3>What is Hostage Negotiation?</h3>
This refers to the discussion between armed aggressors and trained police officers in order to diffuse a hostile situation that involves the use of hostages.
Hence, we can see that some of the equipment which a hostage negotiation team would carry includes writing materials, communication equipment, first aid, etc.
Read more about hostage negotiation here:
brainly.com/question/1569401
Answer: C. increasing global coffee trade
Explanation: the answer is C. increasing global coffee trade, because we need to sell all coffee and in the country is not possible because of the saturated market, and Daniel need make use of the coffee to get earnings,
in the rest of answer you will find that Daniel can not sell the coffee, because off that the rest of answer is wrong.
Now keep in mind that a good mixture of all answer will be a better market for daniel but according to the question he need make use of this excess capacity, and he can do it selling all the coffee and like this not possible in the country we can find it in another country increasing global coffee trade
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
I think it's both the railroad inspector and the driver who drives the car. The railroad inspector didn't come fix the problem and the driver didn't take his car to the shop to get his problem fixed. So honestly, it's both their faults.
