The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
Answer:
No, because California and Oregon are corrupt and people are moving away from them.
Explanation:
Hi,
Here are a few advantages that should help you answer your question:
1. superior leadership in Abraham Lincoln
2. greater population – 22 million people
3. military power – a five to two advantage in men who could fight, a navy, war machinery industrial power
4. more factories
5. more money
6. more railroads
7. more farmland where food crops, not cash crops were grown
Before Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany, his book Mein Kampf called for the total removal of Jews from the country of Germany. Mein Campf was an autobiography by Adolf Hitler in which he outlined his future plans regarding the country of Germany and also his political ideologies.The book was published on 18th of July in the year 1925.
