Answer:
The case has yo be decided first and in The Supreme Court
A state is a polity under a system of governance with a monopoly on force. There is no undisputed definition of a state.[1][2] A widely used definition from the German sociologist Max Weber is that a "state" is a polity that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence, although other definitions are not uncommon.[3][4] A state is not synonymous with a government, as stateless governments like the Iroquois Confederacy exist.[5]
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer: i don't know you have to figure it out yourself duh.
Explanation: this is none of your beeswax ok
Answer: Strict liability
Explanation:
Strict liability basically responsible for holding the someone liable for the damages and loss without any mistake. Basically , it is the legal concept which the person are responsible for their consequences and action.
It is also known as absolute liability that basically caused by the damages and the defective products. The strict liability are basically reorganize as criminal law and possession crime is one of the example of the strict liability.
