1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Igoryamba
3 years ago
11

Opponents of the surveillance allowed under Title II of the Patriot Act argue that _____.

Law
2 answers:
katen-ka-za [31]3 years ago
7 0
The answer will probably be C
andrew-mc [135]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

They believe that the government no longer has to show evidence that the subjects of search orders are an agent of a foreign power, that the FBI does not have to show probable cause to gain access to private information

You might be interested in
My Dad is coming back ?
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

um please ask a proper question

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the establishment clause and free exercise clause put in the Constitution​
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

First Amendment and Religion. The First Amendment has two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment clause prohibits the government from "establishing" a religion

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Road users moving into your lane, brake lights, and abrupt changes in road surface are _____. A. rare at night B. indicators of
Damm [24]

Answer: B

Explanation:

It’s the only one that actually makes sense

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the constant in the circular flow model?
tiny-mole [99]

The two flows in the circular flow model are the real flow and money flow. Real flow being counterclockwise of economic resources and finished goods and services. Money flow would be the counter wise direction of income and consumption expenditures.

8 0
3 years ago
The state trial court in nevada issued a decision in which a party was found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future
bija089 [108]

The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:

The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.

Answer:

No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can the Criminalization be reformed
    15·1 answer
  • If a witness offers an out-of-court statement made by
    11·1 answer
  • What's your favorite billie eilish song ? mine is no time to die for now.​
    5·2 answers
  • 1. $ stands for symbols
    11·2 answers
  • Do you think that a name is only a name? Or, do you feel that a name truly describes a person and has great meaning?
    7·2 answers
  • In a general sense, what are crimes?
    8·1 answer
  • What role does politics play in the UAE and around the world? pls dont give wrong answers
    10·1 answer
  • 8 liters is the same as how many gallons? round anwer to the nearst tenth
    7·2 answers
  • Explain the following phrase “Experience in government is an unwritten but important qualification.”
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a defensive driving technique to manage space zones
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!