1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Igoryamba
3 years ago
11

Opponents of the surveillance allowed under Title II of the Patriot Act argue that _____.

Law
2 answers:
katen-ka-za [31]3 years ago
7 0
The answer will probably be C
andrew-mc [135]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

They believe that the government no longer has to show evidence that the subjects of search orders are an agent of a foreign power, that the FBI does not have to show probable cause to gain access to private information

You might be interested in
I literally put my card number in last week and paid for this, why cant i even get awnsers now.. bs
erastova [34]

Answer: Well people just dont want to answer or its because what ever thing you bought it on which you didn't need to do all you have to do is answer some questions then you will not have ads and you will get points so you can ask questions.

Explanation: YOU SHOULDENT HAVE PUT UR CARD IN

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mrs. Slow was driving her small compact car down Main Street when she was rear-ended by Mr. Fast driving a large truck. Mrs. Slo
hichkok12 [17]

Answer: i don't know you have to figure it out yourself duh.

Explanation: this is none of your beeswax ok

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How long do you go to jail for in US for impersonating a police officer? (NOTE: I KNOW THE ANSWER, IF YOU ARE WRONG, I WILL REPO
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

Depending on state law, impersonating a police officer may be considered either a felony or a misdemeanor. Punishments for impersonating a police officer include: Imprisonment up to five years :D

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can we compare French revolution to Pakistan situation​
vivado [14]

Answer:

maybe

Explanation:

ome observers believe the crisis is due to the lack of economic opportunities, while others argue that it’s a result of foreign meddling and disproportionate military power. The reality, though, is that these are all consequences rather than the cause of Pakistan’s troubles. Taken as a whole, they underscore a deeper crisis within Pakistani society that goes right to the nation’s very foundations—a crisis of identity that originates in the late 19th century, when the idea of an independent Muslim nation in South Asia first emerged.

As Pakistan was founded in truly modern terms—inspired by the principles of self-determination that were prospering during the wave of independence movements in the post-World War II era—the best place to start understanding Pakistan isn’t actually one of these former colonies, but a future colonist: post-revolutionary France.

Not only does Pakistan’s post-independence trajectory bare an uncanny similarity to that of France’s First Republic, but the critiques of its path are similar to those of the French Revolution.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points) During which phase of a trial is evidence given in the attempt to convince the judge
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Preliminary hearing.

Explanation:

A preliminary hearing in criminal litigation is commonly referred to as a prelim and is the legal process of a "trial before the trial" of an accused or the defendant.

This simply means that, at the preliminary hearing, the judge using the "probable cause" legal standard, decides whether there is enough evidence to warrant the defendant to stand trial but not to determine whether he or she is guilty or innocent of the crime. Thus, no jury is present or required at this phase of trial because the defendant isn't entitled to any at the preliminary hearing.

Additionally, during the preliminary hearing phase of a trial, evidence is given in the attempt to convince the judge that there is enough evidence to go to trial. A prosecutor on behalf of the government may call witnesses to testify against the defendant and even present physical evidence to the judge, so that the case may go to trial while the defense counsel will work towards having the case dismissed by cross examining the government witnesses and disputing any evidence presented.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The attempted assassination of President Teddy Roosevelt caused so much public outrage that the insanity defense was greatly res
    11·1 answer
  • - The American Medical Association classifies alcohol as:
    14·1 answer
  • A democratic government differs from a dictatorship in the way that it:
    9·1 answer
  • Sabine came from the Czech Republic to the United States to work as an au pair, or so she thought. When she arrived, she was tak
    6·2 answers
  • What does mens rea stand for?
    8·1 answer
  • What type of employee is most likely to steal from their employer
    11·2 answers
  • A veteran wants to buy a home for which the owners will accept no less than $120,000. The Certificate of Reasonable Value indica
    15·1 answer
  • Because of the dominance of the two-party system, ______________ candidates often struggle to raise both funds and the visibilit
    14·1 answer
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
  • 66 points ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!