Answer:
The right answer here is B. A desire to destroy anything that could threaten communism in China.
Explanation:
The Red Guards turned into one of the most effective and dealiest instruments of Chairman Mao Zedong´s manipulation during the Cultural Revolution. The real purpose of Mao was to destroy and remove from office his political opponents and critics, thus consolidating his position as Red China´s paramount leader. He used his wife Jiang Qing and other radicals to launch and promote the campaign. Its official aim was to destroy vestiges of the old, traditional, "reactionary" Chinese culture - such as Confucianism, Buddhism - and burgueois, rightist elements in the Communist Party. The Red Guards movement started in universities and schools. Mao was delighted about them and allowed their abuses. They publicly denounced, vilified, beat and humilliated hundreds of thousands of innocent people. They were a magnificent weapon of caos and destruction.
Answer:
B. What countries in Africa have successful manufacturing industries?
Explanation:
Economic history is the study of economies of the past. This includes financial and business history of a given area. in this case, the student will ask the questions about the manufacturing industries in Africa so as to know which country is likely to have a good economy due to the rise of the manufacturing industries.
Answer:
A. election of a national president
Explanation: sale of land, agreements between nations and wars between nations all include relations between multiple nations, however election of a national president is only inside the nation and can’t effect boundaries.
-Hope this helps<3
I can safely say that the meatballs they used for their slingshots Where definitely spicy.
Answer:
Social Darwinism and American Laissez-faire Capitalism British philosopher Herbert Spencer went a step beyond Darwin's theory of evolution and applied it to the development of human society. In the late 1800s, many Americans enthusiastically embraced Spencer's "Social Darwinism" to justify laissez-faire, or unrestricted, capitalism.
Explanation:
