Answer:
Option A is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- This is indeed a connection to compulsory tax and government expense stabilizers which weren't at the discretion including its government. Throughout the event of a recession, expenses are cut, rising discretionary income to something like the extent that the economic depression is pacified.
- Unemployment insurance, as well as other social programs, are consequently expanded without the clear intervention of the government
The other options offered are also not relevant to the scenario presented. So, the solution above is the right one.
Answer:
with only one chain and one pendant per necklace.write an expression that shows how much it will cost ronnie to make s short necklaces and n long necklaces. then find the cost for 3 short necklaces 2 long necklaces
Answer:
I couldn't find any possible options, but if Mel wants to expand collaborative involvement between companies, he should try to make them work together.
Mel is probably trying to sell a new software or technological device to his client, and in order to try to convince the client that his offer is the best, he could suggest that the engineers from his company work together with the engineers of the buying company in order to solve any issues or doubts that may exist. This doesn't necessarily mean that they have to come together and work side by side, now you can work together using Skype of other communications app.
Answer:
a. People are the products of their social environment.
Explanation:
The basis for Durkheim's theory of society is the principle that people are the products of their social environments. around them. Emile Durkheim is a well known sociologist and developed lots of social structure theories, which includes the Division of labor, Anomie and Functionalism. The theories of Emile Durkheim's were founded on the concept of social facts, defined as the norms, values, and structures of society.
Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
a. Bad Debt Expense Dr, $36,800 ($40,000 – $3,200)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $36,800
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the bad debt expense as it increased the expenses and at the same time it reduced the assets so the allowance for doubtful accounts is credited
b. Bad Debt Expense Dr, $40,730 ($40,000 + $730)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $40,730
For recording this we debited the bad debt expense as it increased the expenses and at the same time it reduced the assets so the allowance for doubtful accounts is credited
