Answer:
a) only extreme values are used in its calculation.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a data set, the range is given by the subtraction of it's highest value by it's lowest value.
The disadvantage is that it gives a high weight to extreme values, not focusing on central values. So the correct answer is given by option a
(3x-9) +(x+19)+x=180
5x+10=180
-10=-10
5x=170
5 = 5
x=34
2x+(2x+10)+x=180
5x+10=180
-10=-10
5x=170
5 = 5
x=34
yes they are similar
When the number is positive, its opposite is less than the number.
9 ==> -9 . . . . . . less
72 ==> -72 . . . . less
324 ==> -324 . . less
When the number is negative, its opposite is greater than the number.
-8 ==> 8 . . . . . . greater
-3/4 ==> 3/4 . . . greater
-429 ==> 429 . . greater .
We've seen that the opposite can be less, and it can also be greater.
I guess that means that it's sometimes greater.
Answer:
The 93% confidence interval for the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574). This means that we are 93% sure that the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574).
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of
, and a confidence level of
, we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

In which
z is the zscore that has a pvalue of
.
For this problem, we have that:

93% confidence level
So
, z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of
, so
.
The lower limit of this interval is:

The upper limit of this interval is:

The 93% confidence interval for the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574). This means that we are 93% sure that the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574).
Answer:
6:00pm is the answer
Step-by-step explanation: