Answer:
Texas shared the position of other slave states regarding the future of new territories and new states. It wanted the expansion of slavery. Southern states advocated a popular sovereignty solution, that is, new states to be admitted to the Union should choose by themselves. The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was a political compromise. Nevertheless, Texas had important objections. In a speech in the Senate delivered on February 15, 1854, Texan leader Sam Houston lists two important obstacles: Nebraska had a too small population in order to sustain organization , and Kansas was a land with very few white settlers and entirely occupied by Native tribes.
Explanation:
1. Squire
2.Windmill
3.Continues to follow
Hope I helped you.
A. knowledge bug some says it's the art of thought as well
The statement is true.
The Missouri Compromise debate illustrated that northern Republicans did not want slavery to expand for primarily moral reasons.
The Monroe Doctrine was a forceful statement that declared that westward expansion for the United States could not be prevented on any account since its destiny was divinely appointed.
As a way to preserve the stability of energy in Congress between slave and loose states, the Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 admitting Missouri as a slave nation and Maine as a loose country.
The Missouri Compromise became a united states federal rules that compromised northern tries to completely limit slavery's expansion by means of admitting Missouri as a slave kingdom and Maine as a unfastened one.
This rules admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a non-slave country on the same time, in order not to disenchant the balance between slave and free states within the nation. It additionally outlawed slavery above the 36º 30' range line in the the rest of the Louisiana Territory.
Learn more about Missouri Compromise here brainly.com/question/8140181
#SPJ4
