I believe that would be Golgi Apparatus and the plasma Membrane most likely hope this helps.
Answer: The process of peer-review starts with a scientist submitting his article to a peer-review journal. After that, the quality of the article is evaluated by the panel of the academic reviewers or referees in that field
Explanation:
This isn't always the case and there is no reason it should be .Whether or not a trait is common has to do with how many copies of that gene version (or allele) are in the population. It has little or nothing to do with whether the trait is dominant or recessive. Let's take eye color as an example.
Answer:
D) A Survey of fellow classmates
Explanation:
This is the correct answer because an informal survey involves various answers that may or may not be accurate. Informal surveys cannot be held as scientific fact and are, therefore, not reliable. A scientific journal is reliable because it most likely includes data from an experiment and/or research of a trusted scientist or group. The results of past experiments are very reliable because these are the results of hard work and thorough planning and research. A scientific discussion with colleagues is not very credible because it involves the sharing of opinionated information, but it is certainly more reliable that the varying answers of school-aged peers.
Parenchyma cells synthesize and store organic products.
