1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikitadnepr [17]
3 years ago
5

PLEASE HELP ME (PROMISE I WILL MARK YOU AS BRAINLISTI)

History
1 answer:
marusya05 [52]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

8. F

9. A

10. A

11. F

12. F

13. A

14. F

Explanation:

Im not 100% sure on some but i am on 8, 9, 12, and 13.

You might be interested in
In paragraph 4, which rhetorical device does Lincoln use to emphasize that everyone has a stake in the war?
TiliK225 [7]
This was the missing excerpt:
<span>Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before, the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes his aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces; but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered—that of neither has been answered fully.
</span>
This was the missing choices:
A) logical fallacy
B) extended metaphor
C) parallel structure
<span>D) rhetorical question
</span>
The rhetorical device Lincoln used to emphasize that everyone has a stake in the war is C. PARALLEL STRUCTURE.

He compared the expectations and desires of both parties using the parallel structure to show that the concerns were of the same level of importance.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is not true about the treatment of Mexican Americans?
svlad2 [7]
The answer to this question is: Customs kept Mexican Americans out of many neighborhoods. Why? Well, see below for an explanation!

I chose this answer as the correct answer because Mexicans were subject to strict segregation laws, they were not allowed in all-white schools, and they were indeed forced to attend poorly equipped schools. However, customs did not keep Mexican Americans out of many neighborhoods. The Mendez v. Westminster case never made it to the Supreme Court, but it morally addressed the justification people had for “separate but equal” at the time. Additionally, people tended to externally discriminate people, meaning that they judge others based off of how they look. Because Mexican Americans have a dark skin complexion, they are widely mistaken for being black. This relates to segregation because during times of slavery, blacks were seen as “savages” who behaved and lived better when in physical labor. Mexican Americans never were kept out of neighborhoods to the point where it was that big of a deal, but they were looked at with the facial expression of “they don’t look like me so they’re odd.” If you need extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.
8 0
2 years ago
Do the authors content that the denial of women’s rights has been intentional or unintentional?
Drupady [299]
What passage are you talking about
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
irina1246 [14]

A Quaker agent turned Satanta in when he learned of his participation in the Warren Wagontrain Raid.- this statement is false.

Option: D

Explanation:

In 1871 Kiowa chief Satanta and chief Big tree got punishment of hanged till death due to the murder case. They were native American. They undergone a trial before the final conviction. Native Americans relied on goods provided by buffalo. Buffalo provided much of the useful goods of daily use like rope, fuel, cups and clothes.

Indian territory when merged with Oklahoma territory in 1907 then Oklahoma got a new recognition of new state as Oklahoma state. Before that it was a part of United States. Up to the year of 1890 it was a part of U.S. constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a result of the Mexican-American War?
timama [110]

The correct answer is D, the United States claimed large amounts of land including California, Utah, and New Mexico.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements best describes a major change that took place in New Netherland after the Duke of York claimed
    12·1 answer
  • Just before the battle of midway in world war ii, the u.s. submarine trigger ran aground on a reef. the officers were wearing re
    8·1 answer
  • How much did Hawaii cost and who purchased? PLEASE HELP!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Why did each Axis nation conquer other nations before WWII began?
    6·1 answer
  • What did william henry seward want to do? - A P E X 2020
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLZ
    9·2 answers
  • What is Buddhism in early China
    11·1 answer
  • Swahili includes words borrowed from which language?
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the English bill of rights important? 20 points plzzzzzzz help
    12·1 answer
  • What materials were used to build the pyramids?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!