Answer and Explanation:
an Advocate of EMH believes that investor are kin to analyze and uncover any new information which may generate greater returns on the investment. also for that purpose they are willing to spend time and resourses.
it acts as an incentive for them as they believe efficient pricing of security depends upon requirement of rigorously efficient market information.
Answer:
Increase
Explanation:
Since the Contribution increased and Fixed Costs have decreased, the resulting effect is an Increase in Net Operating Income. Thus, all other factors remain the same, net operating income will: Increase
Options:
a. have no effect on; increase; decrease; negative
b. increase; increase; decrease; negative
c. increase; increase; increase; positive
d. increase; increase; decrease; uncertain
e. decrease; increase; decrease; negative
Answer:
Option D is the correct answer.
An increasing number of firms decide to install tablets and computers so that customers are able to order and pay on their own. This can be expected to <u>increase</u> investment spending by the firms. At the same time we can expect the unemployment rate to <u>increase</u> and consumption spending to <u>decrease</u>. Overall the effect on gross domestic product (GDP) is <u>uncertain.</u>
Explanation:
Since, Firm choose to build venture by introducing tablets and PCs and hope to accomplish benefit level. And yet joblessness can be relied upon to increment and subsequently utilization spending will diminish. Thus, the general impact GDP is dubious in light of the fact that an underlying increment in venture increment the monetary development level by increment in work rate. On the off chance that business rate increment, at that point consequently utilization spending increment. And yet it was relied upon to expand joblessness rate which decline the utilization spending. Thus, all things considered GDP may increase or diminish . Consequently GDP is dubious.
Answer:
Both Hillyland and Flatland will be better off in a win-win solution if they engage in comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Suppose each nation decides to specialize in the most suitable crop, and trade with the other nation for the other product, the trade-offs will be the products they supposedly can produce but do not have comparative advantage in. For Hillyland it will be rice and for Flatland it will be coffee.
When both nations practice comparative advantage there will be no losers because economic theory suggests that, when countries practice comparative advantage, the sum total of their combined output will be greater than if they had produced all products themselves because they wanted to be self sufficient.
The logic is simple, goods are less costly to produce in a country that has comparative advantage and at the end they could be sold cheaper to the country that traded it off.
