Company objective , for more help text me on +16315364792
Answer:
The government
Explanation:
In the command economy, the government makes all economic decisions in the country. The command economy is also known as the command centrally planned economy. A central authority, which is the government decides what products will be manufactured, and they will be distributed.
The government makes economic plans for the country that outlines the level of production. It allocates resources required for production as per the plans. The government though its different agencies, owns the factors of production.
Answer:
Option D is the correct option
Explanation:
To find the optimal fund to combine with risk free rate of return, we will use Coefficient of variation,
Coefficient of variation(CoV) = Standard Deviation/Expected Return
CoV of Buckeye = 14%/20% = 0.7
CoV of Wolverine = 11%/12% = 0.9167
So, higher the CoV higher the risk, we will take Buckeye to combine with Risk Free Return.
Hence, Option A
- Required target return of portfolio = 22%
Risk Free return = 8%
Buckeye Return = 20%
Let the weight of Buckeye be X ,& weight of risk free be (1-X)
Required return = (WRF)*(RRF) + (WB)*(RB)
22 = (1-X)(8) + (X)(20)
22 = 8-8X + 20X
14 = 12X
X = 1.17
SO, weight of Buckeye is 1.17 or 117%
while weight of Risk free is -0.17 (1-1.17) or -17%
Hence, ans is OPTION D
Answer:
$4
$1 and $3
False
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
a)
Amount of tax for each bottle is $4 because the sellers are receiving $2 and buyers are paying $6. Therefore,
Amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $6 - $2 = $4
b)
Burden on the consumer = $6 - $5
= $1
Burden on the seller = $4 - $1
= $3
c)
False, because the tax incidence depends on the flexibility or elasticity of market.
Answer:
Expound, cajoled, inscrutable, acrimony, exult, harry, fluctuate
Explanation:
Word banks
Fill in the blanks using these words: fluctuate, cajole, expound, acrimony, exult, inscrutable, metier, and harry.
Councilwoman moore stepped up to the podium. "i don't think i need to expound upon reasons for voting against the proposed construction; i thought that the message was clear enough at the last meeting--when you all opposed it as well. obviously, someone has cajoled a few of you into changing your opinion since last month, and your sudden, inscrutable decision to yield to beta-rad enterprises bothers me a great deal. what happened to the surplus of acrimony toward beta-rad from the last meeting? don't you remember how we exult in our victory over the radioactive waste dump? for two years, we've listened to beta-rad executives harry us, and we finally had the chance to stop it for good. how could the opinions of fifteen people possibly fluctuate this much?"
word bank:
