<u>Answer:</u>
<em>C. Men could marry anyone they chose, but women had no say in marriage.
</em>
<em>E. Women had some legal rights and protections, but not as many as men.
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to many, the role of women has been not well-interpreted or it is not understood. However, people think today that the role of women in the Jewish community have low importance because they does not make any decision, for instance, in marriage. They have no choice but to get married to a man that has been presented to them without question. This, therefore, explains how they have no say in their life.
Even though women had rights that protect them, they were not as strong as those that protected men. However, in matters of religion, they were all equal.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Subsurface rights.
Explanation:
When a new owner acquires a piece of land it important to considered that all the group of rights related to that specific land will belong to the new owner, and if the land is sold several times in the new purchase will always be implicit the belonging of all the related rights the property may have. All these appurtenances will pass from one owner of land to the next one as the property changes its belonger.
Answer:
Slippery Slope
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the question it seems that Aaron is using a Slippery Slope reasoning fallacy. This fallacy refers to when an individual claims that a when a relatively small event occurs it causes a chain or events to unfold that end up in some big and significant effect. Which seems to be the case when he states that "if politicians ban automaitc assault rifles then it will eventually cause mass school shootings every day".
the quality or state of being accountable
