Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": The new product should deliver a meaningful and perceivable benefit to a sizable number of people.
Explanation:
A new product is a good or service that is going to be introduced to the market to satisfy the need for a specific sector. <em>For the new product to be successful, the need that it satisfies should represent a benefit for the target audience great enough to make them pay for it</em>. Besides, the new good or service must bring a differential feature to consider it more attractive compared to competitors or similar products that might already exist.
Answer:
B) losses you avoided by not buying a stock that has since decreased in price
Explanation:
If a stock has not been bought, there has not been a transaction involving that particular stock. Even though, in theory, you may have avoided losses by not buying a stock that has decreased in price, there hasn't been any actual gain or loss on investment related to that stock since there was no investment.
Since all other alternatives present valid parameters when calculating return on investment, the answer is B).
Answer:
Seller Surplus
Explanation:
In business terms, there is a difference in the expected value what a seller expects to receive from the products it sells and from the amount it actually earns.
The cost of the product not only involves the monetary cost but it also involves the cost in terms of efforts involved to produce an article.
When a seller puts a product in the market, then he tries to have it a market value more than its cost. When such market value is realised then the difference in cost and market value is surplus for the supplier or producer.
But in cases where the consumer is efficient enough to bargain such product and only pays an amount which is less than the cost, then there arises seller deficit, which is represented as a negative seller surplus.
A retrenchment strategy <span>is another term for a defensive strategy.
</span>Companies use the retrenchment strategy with the goal to reduce the diversity or the overall size of the operations of the company and by doing so to cut expenses and reach to a more stable financial position.
<span>This strategy will revitalize the organizational resources.</span>
Answer: The correct answer is True.
Explanation: This is a case of employer liability - employers are liable to their employees' act, whether it was due to the employer's intention or not, or whether the employer means to cause harm or not, provided the employees still act within the scope of their employment. The same applies if the employees had carried out good deeds within the scope of their employment, the employers share the good news - just the same way an employer profits from employee's labor, the employer is legally liable when the employee commits harm.
Employers are <em>vicariously liable</em> under doctrine of "respondeat superior" for the negligence or omissions caused by their employees during the course of their employment with the company. The doctrine of "respondeat superior" according to Law dictionary means a doctrine in tort law that makes a master liable for the wrong of a servant. There was a particular scenario I witnessed: a colleague of mine while working late at work had a visitor at the Reception and opted to see him. Unfortunately for her, an accident happended - a car broke into the office and she sustained a lot of injuries. The employer paid for all her reimbursable expenses during her treatment, paid her mum a certain amount for taking care of her, including buying her a new phone because the old one got damaged during the accident although insurance took care of some of the health bills. Because the employer knew it was binding in the court of law, she could not be forced to resume. She eventually resumed after 6 months!
