1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xeze [42]
3 years ago
10

Was Napoleon Bonaparte a Hero or Villain?

History
2 answers:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
8 0
Depends on the point of view. To the French he was a hero but to everyone else he seemed like a villain
Svetllana [295]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: To some degree, Napoleon was a hero for providing stability and positive reforms to a country ravaged by a decade of revolution. 2. But Napoleon can also be considered a villain, as he ruled with absolute power and denied his people several rights, including freedom of speech.

Hope this helps...... Stay safe and have a Merry Christmas!!!!!!!!!! :D

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the correct order of the steps used in the scientific method?
Ilya [14]

(1) pose a question (2) conduct background research (3) formulate a hypothesis (4) test the hypothesis (5) analyze the data and draw a conclusion (6) communicate the results

Hope this helps, and please mark me brainliest if it does!

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is TRUE?
zzz [600]
I believe B is the answer..
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was roman republic governed ?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 BC to 27 BC. It started after the period of the Roman Kings and ended with the start of the Roman Empire. Here, Cameron Sweeney explains how government operated in the Roman Republic. It considers the Senate, the Assembly, the Quaestors, Aediles, and Praetors, the Consuls, and the Censors.

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline .

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline.

Rome. Surely the best-known empire in the history of mankind. Rome has left behind it a legacy of art, philosophy, literature, and architecture (and a horse Consul, but we will ignore that). People know of the writings of Seneca, or of the story of Aeneid, or even about the aqueducts and Coliseum. Whether it be when Caligula declared war on Neptune or the stories of Julius Caesar, people typically know quite a bit about Rome. But what many people don't know about is their government. The Romans have left a mold in which western civilizations have used in the formation of their government.

Social Divisions During the Republic

Up until Julius Caesar took hold of Rome in 49 BC, Rome was not ruled by an all-powerful individual, but by two elected Consuls. At that time, Rome was considered a Republic, and Rome was the closest it would ever be to a democracy.

The citizens of the Republic were broken up into three main social classes; the Patricians, Plebeians, and Slaves.

The patricians were usually the wealthiest and elite families of Rome. I emphasize families because Rome was a society where even the wealthiest plebeians weren't considered patricians, due to their “gens” or name. Patricians lived in grand villas and had slaves do their work for them. Due to their elite social class, they were allowed to vote and participate in government.

The plebeians were the lower class of Rome. Typically without wealth or slaves, the plebeian class usually had to work for a living (an utterly repulsiveidea, I know). It was not uncommon, however, for a wealthy plebeian to buy their way into the patrician class, if a certain patrician family was in dire need of funds. Regardless of this, Plebeians were still citizens of Rome and thus were also allowed to vote and participate in government.

The slave class of Rome, on the other hand, had no money, no land, and no freedoms. Although slaves, they had some rights and often would occupy important positions such as accountants or physicians. Nonetheless, they were not considered citizens of Rome and were not allowed the right to vote or participate in government.

The Senate

Throughout the history of Rome, the Senate played an important part in Roman politics and government. The Senate consisted of men aged 30 or older, and senators held their office for their entire life!  Senators would advise the Consuls, and even the Emperor later in Roman history, and would often discuss and vote on legislation.

What makes the Senate interesting is that it had no legislative power. That's right, the Senate had no power to create or destroy laws. This didn't make it powerless, as the Senate still held a significant influence over government and acted as a prime advisory body to the Consuls in the time of the Republic.

During the time of the Emperor the Senate naturally lost significant power. Even so, the Senate discussed domestic and foreign policy and supervised relations with foreign powers and governments. The Senate would direct the religious life of Rome and, most importantly, controlled state finances. The ability to control finance was an incredible tool for the Senate's disposal, as that gave them leverage when the Germanic tribes decided they wanted to give taking over Rome just one more try, and the Emperor needed additional funds to wage war.

Conclusion

The Roman Republic, and SPQR in general had been a civilization that stood the test of time, and ultimately existed for roughly 1800 years.The way they wrote, sculpted, and governed shaped, and continues to shape, the world we live in today. Their ability to govern, reform, and adapt to their growing environment is what ultimately allowed them to exist for almost two millennia, and prove themselves such a successful civilization.

3 0
3 years ago
How might geography influence the illegal immigration issue concerning the U.S and Mexico?
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

Large-scale Mexican-U.S. migration has changed social, economic, and cultural life on both sides of the border. Migration to the United States can offer increased earnings and savings accumulation (Gathmann 2008).

4 0
3 years ago
Please help me I will give brainliest!
IrinaVladis [17]
Established the power of judicial review for the US supreme court and lower federal courts, judges determine wether or not a law is unconstitutional or not, which led to US involvement in the french british war in 1803
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which way did Roosevelt attempt to restore the nation's confidence in the banking system? A. Firing and replacing top banking
    9·2 answers
  • What type of strategy was used in the invasion of Normandy on d-day ?
    13·2 answers
  • An activist in 19th century italy is giving a speech he claims that italians all share a language and culture but are divided in
    5·2 answers
  • What two things shaped US foreign policy in the 1930's?
    11·1 answer
  • Did the author witness the events described ?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me with question 9
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the domesday book important?
    10·1 answer
  • What was one effect of the blending of cultures due to trade during medieval times?
    13·2 answers
  • How many people are in this world 1 1000 100000000 400000000
    10·1 answer
  • Describe Musa's caravan that he took to Mecca?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!